Search results “Literature articles by quality”
How to write a literature review
How to write a literature review. It’s easier than you might think! In this video, I demonstrate how to search the literature and identify relevant papers for your literature review. I do a pubmed search using Boolean operators and MeSH terms (these are extremely powerful tools that will help you sift through the large number of academic papers out there). So if you’re doing a master’s thesis or a PhD, or you’re doing research and writing a paper, at some point, you’ll need to do a lit review. A big part of that review is the search and this video is going to help you get that right. You might be doing a systematic literature review or meta-analysis – again, you’ll need to do a good PubMed search that identifies the right studies. Thanks to BMC !!! ----------------------------- This video was sponsored by BMC – (click here to go to BMC: https://goo.gl/RFaUA2 ). As a pioneer of open access publishing, BMC has an evolving portfolio of high-quality peer-reviewed journals including broad interest titles such as BMC Biology and BMC Medicine, specialist journals such as Malaria Journal and Microbiome, and the BMC series. BMC is committed to continual innovation to better support the needs of research communities, ensuring the integrity of the research we publish, and championing the benefits of open research. BMC is part of Springer Nature, giving us greater opportunities to help authors connect and advance discoveries across the world. I’m particularly excited about having BMC’s support because I’ve been working with them for nearly 15 years as the Editor-in-Chief of the journal Globalization and Health. I’ve been extremely impressed by them as a company that has integrity and that is truly making the world a better place. LEARN MORE about literature reviews ------------------------------------------------------------ Of course, there is more to a literature review than just the search. You need to have a structured approach to selecting paper, extracting data, writing the review itself and creating a bibliography. For more detail on these aspects of a literature review, go to www.learnmore365.com where I have a full course on literature review (it takes about 30 minutes to complete). About this channel ------------------------------ This channel posts global health and public health teaching videos and videos about how to find the right job in global health. If you haven't already, please consider subscribing to this channel and becoming part of this community. SUBSCRIBE: -------------------- Click here: https://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=YourChannelNameHere LETS CONNECT: --------------------------- Twitter: @drgregmartin Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/drgregmartin/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thisweekinglobalhealth/ SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL ----------------------------------------- Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drgregmartin
2.3 Let's Write: First Lines and Literature Review Of Research Thesis
If you are having troubles with your research paper, I might have a solution for you. My full course "Research Methods for Business Students" is available on Udemy. Here you can also submit YOUR questions to me and receive FEEDBACK ON YOUR PAPER! As you are my students, the course is only for 9.99 USD with following link: https://www.udemy.com/research-methods-for-business-students/?couponCode=RESEARCH_METHODS_1
Views: 180590 MeanThat
Critical Appraisal of the Nursing Literature
Learn the basics of critically appraising nursing literature in this video. This was created for the Idaho State University Nursing course, 'NURS 6610, Advanced Evidence Applications'
Views: 6106 ISU Libraries
LITERATURE - George Orwell
George Orwell is the most famous English language writer of the 20th century, the author of Animal Farm and 1984. What was he trying to tell us and what is his genius? If you like our films, take a look at our shop (we ship worldwide): https://goo.gl/vSiVRh Join our exclusive mailing list: http://bit.ly/2e0TQNJ Or visit us in person at our London HQ https://goo.gl/90vzcY FURTHER READING You can read more on our great thinkers at our blog: TheBookofLife.org at this link: https://goo.gl/Ne28ro MORE SCHOOL OF LIFE Our website has classes, articles and products to help you think and grow: https://goo.gl/7w22rM Watch more films on Literature and our Curriculum in our playlist: http://bit.ly/TSOLcapitalism Do you speak a different language to English? Did you know you can submit Subtitles on all of our videos on YouTube? For instructions how to do this click here: https://goo.gl/rU7lhw SOCIAL MEDIA Feel free to follow us at the links below: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/theschooloflifelondon/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheSchoolOfLife Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/theschooloflifelondon/ CREDITS Produced in collaboration with: Mike Booth http://www.youtube.com/somegreybloke #TheSchoolOfLife
Views: 856690 The School of Life
How to Critically Appraise Articles- Idaho State University Library
Learn the basics of using critical appraisal checklists and literature matrices to evaluate health sciences journal articles. It really is easier than it sounds! This was originally created for NURS-6610 (Advanced Evidence Applications).
Views: 30054 montmol2
How to Write the Academic Critique Assignment--Critique of Academic Journal Article
Review of a model APA paper for the critique and presentation assignment of PSYC 334, Summer 2014.
Views: 92999 David Taylor
13 Tips for Writing a Great Journal Article
13 TIPS FOR WRITING A GREAT JOURNAL ARTICLE: This short video by John Bond of Riverwinds Consulting gives tips on writing a journal article. FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publishing consulting practice at www.RiverwindsConsulting.com JOHN'S NEW BOOK is “Scholarly Publishing: A Primer” To find out more about the book: https://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/about-scholarly-publishing Buy it at Amazon: http://amzn.to/2jqaLPp SEND IDEAS for John to discuss on Publishing Defined. Email him at [email protected] or see http://www.PublishingDefined.com CONNECT Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnHBond/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbondnj/ Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/113338584717955505192/ Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51052703-john-bond/ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnBond/ TRANSCRIPT Hi there. I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined. Today I have 13 tips for writing a great academic article or paper. First, let us start before any writing has occurred. Think about whether the effort is justified. Is the topic new and novel in the field? Is the article about a particularly timely topic in your area? Don’t just write an article because you can; rather look to make a difference. Second, think about where you want to submit the manuscript. Be a loyal reader of any journal you intend to submit to; do not just pick one out of an online search. Know the mission of the publication. This will allow you to focus your writing on that journal. Third, follow the instruction or guidelines for authors for that journal very closely, particularly in regard to length and format. Now, let us look at mechanics. The fourth tip is to follow closely the appropriate style manual. Whether the AMA, APA, Chicago style guides, or others, you will benefit by understanding these guidelines in your field. Fifth, short and concise is always better. This applies to the entire manuscript but also to sentence length and paragraph length as well. No one ever said, “I wish that paper was longer.” Ruthlessly delete all extraneous materials. Sixth, follow accepted practices in regard to grammar and style. If you do not know the expected practices find someone that does. Also, read the articles in the journals you are submitting to so you can understand the tone of these articles. Now, let us look at the content presentation. Seventh, when the paper is written, review the abstract very, very closely. Many people will read only the abstract and it needs to be flawless. Make sure it conforms to the abstract format in your intended publication. Eight, consider the article title very carefully. Avoid a boring title which is really just a label. Consider something thought provoking or maybe even provocative, but do not stray so far that it is corny or sensational. Ninth, make sure any tables, charts, images, or graphics are essential and created in a quality fashion. Does each item standalone by itself? Lastly, let us consider the review of the manuscript before submission. My tenth tip is to read the final manuscript aloud several times. This helps for clarity and language. Eleventh, aside from having the content reviewed by your peers before submission, have others outside your field read the paper as well. Listen closely to any suggestions they have. Twelfth, avoid any hint of plagiarism. Always cite your sources. Never take any passage or ideas from others. An error here can affect your career or reputation. Finally, I know many people that watch these videos are non-English language speakers that may be submitting to an English language journal. If so, I suggest having a native English language colleague or speaker read and help craft the paper before submission. This will likely increase the quality of the final product and therefore increase the likelihood of acceptance. If you do not know anyone to help with this, there are many editorial services that will now assist for a fee. Or email me for suggestions of editors that can help with this. At the end of the day, there is no secret to success. Attention to detail and a careful review of the language will hopefully improve your work.
Views: 8032 John Bond
Evaluating Journal Articles with the CAARP Test
A brief tutorial on evaluating journal articles and websites for use in academic research. You will learn how to critically apply evaluation criteria to an article in order to determine its quality and usefulness as a research source. This video is primarily for students in ENGL 102 who are completing the Article Review Essay.
Views: 17880 Melissa Mallon
PhD: How to write a great research paper
Writing papers and giving talks are key skills for any researcher, but they arenΓÇÖt easy. In this pair of presentations, IΓÇÖll describe simple guidelines that I follow for writing papers and giving talks, which I think may be useful to you too. I donΓÇÖt have all the answersΓÇöfar from itΓÇöand I hope that the presentation will evolve into a discussion in which you share your own insights, rather than a lecture.
Views: 64986 Microsoft Research
research critique
Views: 53966 TheNursing4all
How to Write a Critique Essay (An Evaluation Essay_
Defines the five common parts of a critique essay and provides a formula for completing each part.
Views: 302036 David Taylor
Understanding 'Levels of Evidence' - What are Levels of Evidence?
This tutorial will explain levels of evidence, based on research study design, so that you can find the best evidence for your practice using a database. It was developed by the Physiotherapy Association of British Columbia for PABC members and for members of the Ontario Physiotherapy Association.
Views: 86719 BCPhysio
Finding online sources for your research paper
This video explains how to use google scholar to find research papers to use as the background of your experiment and as sources in your paper. Table of Contents: 00:08 - Types of sources 01:45 - Google Scholar 03:10 - Dowloading PDFs 04:10 - Using reference lists 05:25 - Using the "cited by" link 06:20 - Refining your search terms and using operators 07:50 - Using Wikipedia 08:55 - Using Science Daily
Views: 105403 Steve Kirk
Tips for Writing a Literature Review
Some helpful hints for how to keep the writing process moving forward This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Views: 81230 Amaris Guardiola
How to @ LMU:  Types of Literature for Scholarly Research
This video discusses the broad categories of scholarly literature--primary and secondary sources--and describes scholarly journals and articles, books and reference materials, and gray literature.
Article Assessment
The range of articles and journals is becoming increasingly enormous. Hence, it is inevitable to apply particular tools for performing primary evaluation before reading and studying each article. To follow the objectives mentioned in the previous course, here we will evaluate the quality of the articles themselves according to indexes such as the qualitative level of the publishers, journal quality, edition and revision, as well as data publication. The whole set of tools will empower you as a researcher to find the most relevant and top-quality articles in your study field.
Papers & Essays: Crash Course Study Skills #9
Writing research papers is an essential skill in your career as a student, and this week we’re going to help you do that like a pro. From figuring out where to begin, to finding the best systems, to breaking out of “research recursion system” (maybe just figuring out what that means), we’ve got you covered. Crash Course is made with Adobe Creative Cloud. Get a free trial here: https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/catalog/desktop.html Resources: How to Write a Great Research Paper by Simon Peyton Jones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3dkRsTqdDA How to Become a Straight-A Student by Cal Newport: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/253203.How_to_Become_a_Straight_A_Student Close Reading and Research: https://collegeinfogeek.com/writing-close-reading-research/ Writing and Editing Tips: https://collegeinfogeek.com/essay-writing-and-editing/ *** Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at http://www.patreon.com/crashcourse Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Mark Brouwer, Bob Kunz, mark austin, William McGraw, Ruth Perez, Jason A Saslow, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Eric Prestemon, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, Thomas Frank, Rachel Bright, Khaled El Shalakany, Ian Dundore, Tim Curwick, Ken Penttinen, Indika Siriwardena, Alexander Tamas, Caleb Weeks, Kathrin Janßen, Nathan Taylor, Andrei Krishkevich, Brian Thomas Gossett, Chris Peters, Kathy & Tim Philip, Mayumi Maeda, Eric Kitchen, SR Foxley, Evren Türkmenoğlu, Tom Trval, Cami Wilson, Justin Zingsheim, Moritz Schmidt, Jessica Wode, Daniel Baulig, Jirat -- Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 205989 CrashCourse
How to Critically Appraise a Systematic Review: Part 1
Part 1 of a 2 part series on how to critically appraise systematic reviews
Views: 54681 Terry Shaneyfelt
What are Systematic Reviews and Literature Reviews
Quality vs. Evidence vs. Research vs. Innovation: Embracing All Types of Clinical Inquiry Learn from the creators of the clinical InQuERI model to understand the difference between all types of clinical inquiry, that is: quality, evidence, research, and innovation! Watch to learn how clinical inquiry ties back to your institution’s standards of practice and more, while learning how to effectively use JBI! Now in 9 separate parts for your convenience! 1. An Introduction and Explanation of Magnet 2. The UCSF Clinical InQuERI Model Part 1 3. The UCSF Clinical InQuERI Model Part 2 4. What are Systematic Reviews and Literature Reviews? 5. Why Does Clinical Inquiry Matter? 6. What is the Joanna Briggs Institute? 7. The 5 Steps of EBP, Part 1 8. The 5 Steps of EBP, Part 2 9. An Overview of Joanna Briggs Institute Resources Speaker: Daphne Stannard RN, PhD, CCNS UCSF Medical Center Director & Chief Nurse Researcher
Views: 4571 OvidWoltersKluwer
Critical Appraisal of a Qualitative Study
MPH by Elearning Unit 5b How Good is the Evidence? Is it Acceptable? ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK
Views: 71436 Andrew Booth
Jiffy Articles Review -Write Unique Quality Articles in Under 10 Minutes With Jiffy Articles
http://makemoneyim.com/Jiffy-Articles Jiffy Articles, another article marktering software by Jon Lager helps you create unique, quality articles in under 10 minutes. Jiffy articles has a huge database of articles templates that you can filter through categories or keywords You'll immediately havea an article template with catchy copy-write quality title , subheaders that will give you an idea for the article structure and an already converting resource box , See the live demo and get the full review at: http://makemoneyim.com/jiffy-articles-review/
Views: 93 Noam Tobi
Critical Appraisal of Evidence
Video about the critical appraisal of evidence in a clinical practice guideline. Note: We have a new website called the Guidelines Resource Centre at www.cancerview.ca/guidelines
Views: 41017 CEPguidelines
How Do I Choose the Best Journal for My Paper?
HOW DO I CHOOSE THE BEST JOURNAL FOR MY PAPER? Which journal is the best one in scholarly publishing for my paper? This video lists the decision points when making this decision. MORE VIDEOS on Choosing Which Journal to Publish Your Article https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqkE49N6nq3jkGjy26P2tVNragL2ik0c2 FIND OUT more about John Bond and his publishing consulting practice at www.RiverwindsConsulting.com SEND IDEAS for John to discuss on Publishing Defined. Email him at [email protected] or see http://www.PublishingDefined.com CONNECT Twitter: https://twitter.com/JohnHBond LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbondnj Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/113338584717955505192 Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51052703-john-bond YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnBond BOOKS by John Bond: The Story of You: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/the-story-of-you/about-the-book/ You Can Write and Publish a Book: http://www.booksbyjohnbond.com/you-can-write-and-publish-a-book/about-the-book/ TRANSCRIPT: How do I decide the best journal for my paper? Hi there, I am John Bond from Riverwinds Consulting and this is Publishing Defined. Today I am to going to be discussing how to choose a scholarly journal for you to submit your paper to. A bit about me: I’ve been in scholarly publishing for over 25 year and as Chief Content Officer for a major medical publisher oversaw the publishing of over 20,000 peer reviewed articles. So, you have collected your data and information or completed your study. You have written your paper. Now what? Prior to deciding, make sure you have had the paper read and critiqued by your colleagues and associates. Consider very carefully their feedback and make the changes where you see fit. Remember to give it one more very close check for grammar, spelling, format and style before moving on. Now you are ready. In starting to consider where to submit your paper, create a chart or list of the options under consideration. Include the journals you read and receive; and the ones you respect. Ask your co-workers and colleagues what journals best fit the topic of your paper and have them weigh in on their opinions on the publications. In your chart, list these journal names and their urls. Most journal website will have an About section that will list the Mission or Aims and Scope of the publication. Read them and see if they align with your content and article format. Add to the chart the journal’s frequency; that is monthly, bimonthly, quarterly. Closely review the Information for Authors published for each Journal, likely at their website. This is the best guide to see if your article is a fit and will save everyone time. Read it very closely. Not just their mission but also the specifications for format and types of articles that are interested in. Also, if a journal has an Impact Factor, it may be listed at their website. If not, sometimes searching the web for that journal’s current Impact Factor will give you an answer. List whether the journal is subscription based, or sent to members of a Society, or an Open Access publication. Sometimes a journal may be more than one of these. If it is Open Access, check out the APC or Author Processing Charge and include the amount, if any. The more widely the journal is available, for example an Open Access publication, the more your article will get downloaded and read. Next check on where the journal is indexed. For instance, in medicine or nursing, being included in Medline or CINAHL are essential. Check for your area of specialty to see if the journal is covered in your key abstracting and indexing service. Once again, go the website and ensure articles are included online in addition to in the paper version of the journal. Are they posted online at acceptance or only when a print version appears? What may be listed at a website is the average time a paper takes to get from submission to decision and then the time it takes to get from acceptance to being published. If your topic has a sense of urgency to it, this time can be a critical decision. These times may not be publicly available. On occasion, the acceptance rate or rejection rate from the previous year may be listed. This would be a key piece of data as well. Search your topic over at a journal’s website to see if they have published any articles on it over the past two years. Most journals are looking for new or novel takes on existing topics and you might want to see what they have recently published. Finally, submit to just one journal at a time. I know it is tempting to reduce the wait time and send out to many journals or publications, but etiquette (and ethics) demand one at a time only.....
Views: 13821 John Bond
Writing Critiques of Research Articles
A&M adjunct instructor Teresa Young discusses conducting and writing critiques of research articles.
Views: 22190 Teresa Young
Tear film osmolarity literature review - Video abstract [95242]
Video abstract of review paper “Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature” published in the open access journal Clinical Ophthalmology by Richard Potvin, Sarah Makari and Christopher J Rapuano. Objective: To evaluate the evidence in the peer-reviewed literature regarding the use of tear osmolarity as a physiological marker to diagnose, grade severity, and track therapeutic response in dry eye disease (DED). In addition, to review the evidence for the role of tear osmolarity in the pathophysiology of DED and ocular surface disease. Methods: A literature review of all publications after the year 2000, which included the keywords “tear osmolarity”, was conducted. Relevant articles were graded according to quality of evidence and research, using the University of Michigan Practice Guideline and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) rating systems. Articles were further categorized by the nature of any reported financial support and by the overall impression they provided related to tear osmolarity. Results: A total of 164 articles were identified as relevant to the search criteria, although some were editorials, and some were written in a foreign language. Of the total, it was possible to grade 159, and an overall impression was generated for 163. A positive impression of tear osmolarity in DED diagnosis was evident in 72% (117/163) of all articles, with a neutral impression in a further 21% (35/163); 7% had a negative impression. The percentage of positive impressions appeared independent of the quality of research; 73% (38/52) of articles graded high/moderate quality supported the use of tear film osmolarity measurement in DED diagnosis. Impressions were also independent of the source of financial support, with 72% (75/104) of independent studies positive. Conclusion: The literature broadly supports the use of tear film osmolarity as an objective numerical measure for diagnosing, grading severity, and managing treatment of DED. Read the review paper here: https://www.dovepress.com/tear-film-osmolarity-and-dry-eye-disease-a-review-of-the-literature-peer-reviewed-article-OPTH
Views: 121 Dove Medical Press
Evidence-Based Practice, Step 2 (part II): Searching- Levels of Evidence
Learn more about the levels of evidence associated with the Evidence-Based Triangle. This video was orginally created for NURS 3330, Evidence-Based Nursing. Table of Contents: 00:00 - Introduction 00:00 - EBP Step 2: Searching for info 00:11 - Levels of Evidence 00:56 - Slide 3 01:17 - Evidence Categories 01:33 - Systematic Reviews 02:07 - Critically Appraised Topics 02:44 - Unfiltered Resources 03:00 - Background Info
Views: 11860 ISU Libraries
How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less
"How to Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less" breaks down this academic assignment into 5 easy steps: (There is a text version of this video: http://www.peakwriting.com/litreview/Index.html 1. Strip out summary paragraphs from research 2. Reorder summary paragraphs for the liteature review 3. Combine paragraphs if necessary 4. Add topic sentences and transitions to form literature review's body paragraphs 5. Add introduction and conclusion paragraphs to complete the literature review The literature review does not have to be a daunting or mysterious academic assignment. As a matter of fact, the so-called "literature review" is a common task in the professional workplace but is called a "backgrounder" or "background research" instead of a literature review. The video provides a real-world example of writing a practical literature review as an HR employee in an IT company. Stop being intimadated by what is actually an easy assignment by learning what a literature review really is and how to do one quickly and easily. Review of Literature | Literature Review Example | Literature Review Sample | Literature Survey | Literature Review Format | Literature Review Dissertation | Example of Literature Review | Writing a Literature Review
Views: 485138 David Taylor
How to Read Scientific Articles
How to read scientific articles
Writing the Literature Review (Part One): Step-by-Step Tutorial for Graduate Students
Take the mystery out of this academic assignment. All you do is: (1) Gather the summaries of your sources. (2) Put the summaries in groups based on theme. (4) Write a paragraph on each group of sources with transitions between each source. 4. Add introduction and conclusion paragraphs. You're done! For examples of previously written literature reviews, see: http://libguides.uwf.edu/c.php?g=215199&p=1420828
Views: 1019322 David Taylor
What does peer review mean?
Peer review is an academic term for quality control. Each article published in a peer-reviewed journal is closely examined by a panel of reviewers.
Views: 12 L&T
How to improve your English writing skills? - Free English lesson
✅ https://youtu.be/puNo0sxC3VI 👉 Check the latest Video - American Idioms I love to use the most? How to improve your English writing skills? - Free English lesson I will share easy and quick tips that will improve writing in formal and academic settings. • Avoid using contractions – Do not use contractions while constructing your sentences, esp. if you are writing a business email or formal letters i.e. words like don’t, can’t, shouldn’t, couldn’t, wouldn’t, isn’t, haven’t should be avoided. • Avoid there are/ there is – It will make your sentence more lengthy and boring to read. e.g There are many problems in her class (incorrect) Her class is facing many problems. (Correct) There is an exhibition at the hotel. (Incorrect) The hotel is holding an exhibition. (Correct) • Avoid using unnecessary words in your sentences like very; really, a lot instead use better vocabulary. It will definitely not change the meaning of your sentence but will make it sound interesting. Students think literature is very hard. Students think literature is difficult. • Make use of strong verbs – It will make your sentence sound more appropriate and concrete. He gave assistance to my friend. (weak verb) My friend assisted him. (Strong verb)
Improving Research Writing for Publication (Full Lecture)
*Presentation by Kevin Heintz, Wordvice Content Manager/Senior Editor, at the annual convention of the Transplantation Society of Taiwan on 3 November, 2017. What Does “Quality of Writing” Mean and Why is It Important in Manuscripts? In the world of clinical and scientific research, rejection by journals is the norm rather than the exception. Almost all researchers who write manuscripts will receive rejection letters from journals, especially in the beginning stages of their careers, and thus rejection should be seen as a learning experience rather than something to be dejected about. This reality raises the question all researchers must ask themselves: “Why are my manuscripts being rejected?” And from a wider perspective: “What are so many manuscripts so often rejected?” One likely answer to this question is that there is a deficiency in “quality of writing” in a great many manuscripts. This can lead not only to rejections, but to continued requests for revision and resubmission (if the research itself is deemed significant and valid), as well as deferment, costing researchers extra time, money, and effort. While there is endless excellent research being conducted at any given time, the manuscripts that get published will combine novelty, relevancy, impact, and other scientific parameters of a good manuscript with another parameter whose importance is often overlooked: “quality of writing.” This is the topic of my presentation today. This video includes: ✔ A comprehensive overview of common problems with “quality of writing” in research papers submitted to journals ✔ Graphics and slides from studies that breakdown the errors in content, grammar, and style derived from millions of edited words in research papers ✔ Tips and suggestions for authors in eliminating these errors prior to submitting their manuscripts Who should watch this video: ★Research writers writing a paper for a journal or conference ★Students interested in learning how to edit their work For more useful writing tips, check out these posts on our “Resources” page: “How to Write the Best Journal Submissions Cover Letter" https://wordvice.com/journal-submissi... “100+ Strong Verbs That Will Make Your Research Writing Amazing” “How to Write an Abstract” “Which Tense to Use in Your Absract” Wordvice Journal Submissions Page https://wordvice.com/category/journal... Join Wordvice on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Wordvice/ Tweet @ us on Twitter: @WordviceEditing Wordvice offers services in other languages and countries: ENGLISH SITE: https://www.wordvice.com KOREA: https://www.essayreview.co.kr JAPAN: https://www.wordvice.jp TAIWAN: https://www.wordvice.com.tw CHINA: https://www.wordvice.cn TAIWAN: https://www.wordvice.com.tw TURKEY: https://www.wordvice.com.tr
A Ph.D. Seminar on Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research - Part 1/5
PART 1: In this introductory doctoral seminar a review of the systematic approach to effective literature search and review in support of Information Systems (IS) research. We will start by reviewing the common pitfalls novice researchers do when conducting literature search in support of a proposed idea for research. You will learn how to avoid such pitfalls and use various approaches in support of valid research-worthy idea. A discussion is provided on the approach of keywords search and its limitations, while learning to overcome these limitations by using the backward and forward literature search techniques. You will also learn techniques to identify high quality peer-reviewed Information Systems (IS) research articles, while learning to locate seminal and foundational theories that guide IS research. The session concludes with a review of the homework and leads on time saving tips, if you wish to do so... ------------ This lecture is based on the article written by Dr. Yair Levy and Dr. Tim Ellis: Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181-212. http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol9/V9p181-212Levy99.pdf ***This paper was the recipient of The Best Paper Award *** http://scis.nova.edu/~levyy/InSITE_BestPaper_LevyEllis.pdf
Views: 12192 YairLevyPhD
Submit your articles to WeArticles
Creating quality content requires special writing skills and when you go for submitting one such article on the best article marketing / article submission website, you are bound to get that online exposure required to reach out to your prospective customers. At WeArticles, we accept posts on varied subjects / topics and thereby go on to provide you with an extensive web platform through which you are able to make yourself known extensively to your potential customers. You even secure high quality back links by using our unique article wizard that allows you to submit articles on appropriate category.
Views: 45 WeArticles
Finding a Research Article wit PubMed - Maria
You are looking for information about diabetes or tissue scaffolds. Use PubMed to find high-quality research articles, reviews, clinical trials, and more. This tutorial shows you how to find the information you need quickly on PubMed.
Views: 360 paramedITs
A Ph.D. Seminar on Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research - Part 5/5
Part 5: In this introductory doctoral seminar a review of the systematic approach to effective literature search and review in support of Information Systems (IS) research. We will start by reviewing the common pitfalls novice researchers do when conducting literature search in support of a proposed idea for research. You will learn how to avoid such pitfalls and use various approaches in support of valid research-worthy idea. A discussion is provided on the approach of keywords search and its limitations, while learning to overcome these limitations by using the backward and forward literature search techniques. You will also learn techniques to identify high quality peer-reviewed Information Systems (IS) research articles, while learning to locate seminal and foundational theories that guide IS research. The session concludes with a review of the homework and leads on time saving tips, if you wish to do so... ------------ This lecture is based on the article written by Dr. Yair Levy and Dr. Tim Ellis: Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181-212. http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol9/V9p181-212Levy99.pdf ***This paper was the recipient of The Best Paper Award *** http://scis.nova.edu/~levyy/InSITE_BestPaper_LevyEllis.pdf
Views: 2691 YairLevyPhD
Finding Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles through UNB Libraries Website
Before you search for articles, you have to figure out which subject area would be researching your topic (e.g. Psychology, Sociology, English Literature). Then you select an article database that specializes in that subject. When you select a database, you will be brought to a new search screen where you can enter your search terms. To ensure that your results only include good quality academic articles, limit your results to Peer-Reviewed Journals only.
Views: 36 STUWritingCentre
Article Writers Australia
http://www.articlewriters.com.au Looking for quality article writers? Wherever you are located, our SEO article writing service can provide custom website content including unique articles, blog posts and product descriptions to help you or your clients achieve more organic website traffic. We also offer general content writing services so if your website content wasn't properly optimised when your site was established and now needs a makeover, or you require written content for a new website, you can call on our content and article writers for quality work. We currently have 24 well qualified and experienced writers on the team so there's an excellent chance that we have an article writer with knowledge of the topic you need us to write about.
Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt (High Quality version)
Buy the book: http://amzn.to/1Mmb4gu Separate videos and book: http://vforvoluntary.com/library/1/econ/articles-videos/19/economics-in-one-lesson Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/austrian_economics 1. Walter Block - The Lesson 2. Thomas DiLorenzo - The Broken Window @ 15:58 3. Jeffrey Herbener - Public Works Means Taxes @ 24:28 4. Tom Woods - Credit Diverts Production @ 41:56 5. Robert Murphy - The Curse of Machinery @ 56:41 6. Walter Block - Disbanding Troops and Bureaucrats @ 1:12:21 7. Mark Thornton - Who's Protected By Tariffs? @ 1:29:35 8. Peter Klein - "Parity" Prices @ 1:47:06 9. Guido Hulsmann - How The Price System Works @ 2:09:13 10. George Reisman - Minimum Wage Laws @ 2:36:41 11. Joseph Salerno - The Function of Profits @ 2:52:45 12. Roger Garrison - The Assault on Saving @ 3:13:18 LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE - CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION 3.0
Coding Part 2: Thematic coding
Thematic coding is one of the most common forms of qualitative data analysis and it is found in grounded theory, several forms of phenomenological analysis and framework analysis. The analyst tries to identify themes, categories or classifications of the data. Passages of the data (commonly an interview transcript) are coded to the themes - that is the passages are tagged or marked with the name of the theme. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Views: 179474 Graham R Gibbs
Finding Journal Articles: Searching for information
This guide will introduce effective searching techniques to help you to improve your search results and locate quality information for your assignments.
Views: 310 wlv skills
Evaluating Sources
A tutorial describing how to evaluate sources. Brought to you by Western Libraries. Please contact Research Help http://www.lib.uwo.ca/services/research.html for more assistance. Email [email protected] or Comment with questions or suggestions on more Videos & How-Tos Evaluating Sources by Western Libraries is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Views: 270449 Western University
Articles Written Review
http://www.articles-written.com to purchase high quality content.
Views: 666 videomarketerpro
Writing an Article Critique - Postgraduate Program in Higher Education
A series of six videos outlining various aspects of Macquarie University's Postgraduate Program in Higher Education.
Views: 65814 Parryville Media
The 5-step translation process - it's best practice for a reason!
There is a well-established 5-step language translation process that is recognised as best practice, and that every translator needs to follow if they expect to provide translations that are accurate and well worded. That is, to translate to professional standard, consistently. Trouble is of course, not all translators do follow this process. In fact, many untrained translators won’t even know about it, or have any inkling why it’s so essential. Basically, translation is a rather difficult skill. You have to simultaneously juggle vocabulary choices and different grammar systems to produce text that not only correctly conveys all the meaning of the original, but does it in a way that reads naturally and well. This turns out to be a bit too much for the brain to handle in a single go, so a multi-step translation process is needed to fix the (virtually inevitable) shortcomings of the first attempt. The key feature of this best-practice process is that it has a separate step to check for accuracy – that all meaning has been carried across into the translation, and another focusing specifically on quality of wording. It’s a time-tested process that makes an enormous difference to translation quality and accuracy. This presentation briefly explains the process, and spells out what happens when the QA steps are either omitted or rushed through to hit a tight deadline. Our related blog article goes into things in a little more depth, and has an excellent summary pdf of the process for download – check it out at http://www.pactranz.com/blog/language-translation-process/ And make sure to also have a look at our other practical translation-related guides and articles. This presentation contains images that were used under a Creative Commons License. Click here to see the full list of images and attributions:https://app.contentsamurai.com/cc/65512
Views: 10044 PacTranz
Editing: Things they don't tell you about what journal editors want
Pippa Smart, independent publishing and research communications consultant and Editor-in-Chief of the journal, Learned Publishing, provides some insights into the ‘black box’ of editorial decision-making and how authors can improve their chances of article acceptance. Recorded 6 July 2016 at a MedComms Networking event in Oxford. Produced by NetworkPharma.tv = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ABSTRACT: Many authors are mystified both by the time it takes to publish work, and by the reasons for its being rejected or accepted only subject to revisions. The process of publication is actually straightforward. Following initial checks for completeness, suitability and plagiarism, high-impact journals tend to reject 70% or more of papers immediately, i.e. within a week or so, while those with less strict criteria will reject at least 30% of submissions. The commonest reasons are that the work is out of scope of the journal, or the quality is insufficient for a variety of reasons, from lack of originality, to flawed science and poor quality writing or overall structure. The review process is generally very time-consuming. It is standard practice to have three reviewers per article; one or two may be suggested by the authors, though not necessarily accepted. Recruiting these reviewers may require eight or more invitations. An editor will normally allow two weeks for review; however, deadlines are frequently missed, and the reviews received may be contradictory or unhelpful, necessitating a further round of reviewer recruitment or sometimes arbitration by an additional reviewer. Acceptance without changes following review is rare; the most common decision by an editor is to request revisions, which may be minor or major. Authors can greatly improve their chances of acceptance by carefully reading journal author guidelines, checking journal scopes to ensure that they submit to a suitable journal, and submitting good quality work. A good article will be attractive to a journal editor, communicate its message clearly and concisely, and encourage citation. Written by Penny Gray, Freelance Medical Writer = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = We are building a library of free webcasts, like this one, for the global MedComms Community and others at http://www.networkpharma.tv and we’d welcome your suggestions for new topics and speakers. Full details of this MedComms Networking event are at http://medcommsnetworking.com/event75.html Pippa’s presentation (PDF format) is at http://medcommsnetworking.com/presentations/smart_02_060716.pdf Pippa’s Linkedin page is at https://www.linkedin.com/in/pippa-smart-2b6b2a2/ More about PSP Consulting can be found at http://www.pspconsulting.org Filming and technical direction by Mario Crispino, Freelance Cameraman & Editor [For the avoidance of doubt: this video is intended to be freely accessible to all. Please feel free to share and use however you like. Cheers Peter Llewellyn, Director NetworkPharma Ltd and Founder of the MedComms Networking Community activity at http://www.medcommsnetworking.com]
Views: 12563 MedComms
Evaluating Sources to Find Quality Research
Three questions you should ask in of any source you find in your research. Photo credits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP2L4ol3H_Y https://www.flickr.com/photos/lamailloux/11563052893 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Portrait_photograph_of_James_Ramsey_Patterson_in_cap_and_gown_1912_(3191692828).jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/16256199615 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closeup_of_protesters_at_Ginowan_protests_2009-11-08.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/24085458046 https://resources.cloud.genuitec.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/curtain.jpg https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/16086839412
Views: 4712 PCC Library
Carve Your Life Book Intro by Dr Prem Jagyasi (Available Feb 2019)
https://drprem.com/life Dr Prem Jagyasi’s Carve Your Life book to be published by Times Group Books (In stores from 1st Feb 2019). Carve Your Life: Live a Great Life with Carvism is a self-empowerment book for those seeking to find their true self, find meaning in their life and lead a fruitful and successful life. Scheduled to be published in India by Times Book Group, a division of the world’s largest English newspaper, The Times of India, this self-help book will be available at all leading online stores and major bookstores in Feb 2019 Carve Your Life narrates Dr Prem’s signature Carvism principles, his detailed description of ‘Self-Carving Qualities’, ways to ‘Shape Your Mind’, and the process to ‘Find Your Passion’. According to the author, our lives are nowadays choked by unnecessary accumulations, because of which we are unable to ‘uncover’ the true purpose of our life; once we do this, we will enjoy a quality life to the fullest. Hence, carving out a lean life is the only way forward. The author, Dr Prem Jagyasi, an award-winning global leader and acclaimed life coach, has delivered keynote speeches and conducted focused workshops in several countries. He is renowned for delivering succinct and customized Carve Your Life training programmes. In his book, he has answered readers’ queries about minimalism, productivity and tactical transformation in one’s self. Shedding light on what inspired him to write this book, Dr Prem Jagyasi says, ‘The art of carving one’s life through minimalism is empowering enough to bring about maximum transformation in one’s real self. My upcoming book intends to be a saviour for all those who wish to find a purpose in their life, bring out their true self, and get most productivity out of their endeavours.’ The rising need for practical, no-nonsense books and media with relevant life-inspiring content has grown exponentially in recent decades. Carve Your Life attempts to bridge that gap and help people identify clutter in their lives, declutter their lives and then focus on the material and non-material aspects that hold and add value in their lives. The book has been edited, published and marketed by  Times Group Books (TGB), a division of The Times of India Group. Madhuita Mohanty, Senior Editor, TGB, says about the upcoming release, ‘We are delighted to publish Carve Your Life. We believe Dr Prem Jagyasi’s indigenously developed philosophy of Carvism will immensely benefit readers as it provides practical insight into the art of being at one’s productive best.’ Read more about Dr Prem Jagyasi at https://drprem.com Read more about Book and Articles at https://drprem.com/life Selective Chapters in Book Chapter 1: Belong to yourself 2 Chapter 3: Declutter your life 12 Chapter 8: Sculpt in mind first 31 Chapter 13: Become a person of value 51 Chapter 15: Sculpt your niche 58 Part II: Self-carving Qualities 79 Chapter 19: Attain self-awareness 80 Chapter 21: Self-esteem – The light within 87 Chapter 23: Self-Reliance – A journey within 93 Chapter 24: Self-love 96 Chapter 27: Self-mentoring 105 Part III: Shape your Mind 115 Chapter 31: Keep your creativity alive 121 Chapter 32: Harness the power of sleep 125 Chapter 33: Brainpower calls 130 Chapter 35: Bridle your emotions 137 Chapter 39: Don’t let sexual addiction cloud your mind 149 Part IV: Find your Passion 153 Chapter 40: What is passion and how to define it 154 Chapter 41: Let intuition be a guiding light 161 Chapter 43: Revisit selfishness 168 Part V: Sculpt With a Plan 171 Chapter 45: See with the mind’s eye 178 Chapter 46: One bite at a time 181 Chapter 49: Confront your weakness 190 Chapter 51: Celebrate milestones 195 Chapter 52: Stay focused and positive 198 Part VI: Getting into Carvism Process 203 Chapter 53: An uninterrupted environment 204 Chapter 57: Say no to multitasking 214 Chapter 60: Dehaze your vision 222 Chapter 63: Productivity hacks 231 Part VII: Bringing out the best in you 237 Chapter 65: Burst your comfort bubble 238 Chapter 67: Explore personal excellence 246 Chapter 70: Eat problems for breakfast 256 Chapter 74: Be productive first, perfectionist afterwards
Fast Articles writing plagiarism free 2019 January
Useful links :- http://www.yousubtitles.com/ https://spinbot.com/ https://www.textfixer.com/tools/remove-line-breaks.php https://smallseotools.com/ TISHITU ISO: 9001: 2015 RESEARCH AND CONSULTANCY CELL OF INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION Copyright © All Rights Reserved www.tishitu.net Reg SSI REG. NO. 081452124498/SSI Accreditation No. M3111204IN Certification No:- 161115605 Scotland Accreditation Forum -~-~~-~~~-~~-~- Please watch: "Lifi Communication by Arduino UNO Download Project" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4gC8dbaiZg -~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Views: 8774 Tishitu
LET Reviewer 2019: Professional Education | TEACHING PROFESSION Part 1
LIST OF ADVANTAGES OF AUDITORY LEARNING 1. Allows for Multi-Tasking Proponents of this learning style claim that learning by ear allows an individual to be versatile when it comes to accomplishing several tasks. This is because by merely listening to audio recordings, one can process information without having to use the eyes or hands. That said, a person can do other things while studying. These can be driving, cooking, painting and cleaning, among others. This makes this learning style effective for people who have to engage in other activities during the process. Consequently, more things will be done in a little time. 2. Increased Retention People who advocate for auditory learning posit that a good listener has the ability to process information through hearing information and eventually retains it. By playing audio recordings repeatedly wherever the location may be, there is an increased possibility of improved retention in the memory bank. ****************************************************************************************************** If you like this videos please don't forget to give it a thumbs up and subscribe to my channel for more updates. social group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/LETRe... website: https://letreviewer101.wixsite.com/we... DISCLAIMER: The admins do not claim ownership on the documents/photo/videos posted on this sites, yet i personalize the contents or articles to give relevant quality issues. all documents/photos/videos are only hosted by third parties as google drive. if you found respective copyright and wish for the documents/photos to be removed or taken down, feel free to contact me via e-mail at [email protected], and all your copyrighted works will be taken down as soon as possible. if you are the original author of any of the files LINKED here, please let me know so that i can acknowledge you better. The main purpose of the reviewer is to assist examinees who chose to review online.Thank you!
Views: 927 Let Reviewer

Fapris 100mg benadryl
Bactrim 500 mg dosage
Generic promethazine codeine cough syrup
Generic name for nasonex nasal spray
Ramipril caps 1 25 mg benadryl