Home
Search results “Court cases articles”
What is INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? What does INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE mean?
 
07:32
What is INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE? What does INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE mean? INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE meaning - INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE definition - INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. The International Court of Justice is the primary judicial branch of the United Nations (UN). Seated in the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, the court settles legal disputes submitted to it by states and provides advisory opinions on legal questions submitted to it by duly authorized international branches, agencies, and the UN General Assembly. Established in 1945 by the UN Charter, the Court began work in 1946 as the successor to the Permanent Court of International Justice. The Statute of the International Court of Justice, similar to that of its predecessor, is the main constitutional document constituting and regulating the Court. The Court's workload covers a wide range of judicial activity. After the court ruled that the United States's covert war against Nicaragua was in violation of international law (Nicaragua v. United States), the United States withdrew from compulsory jurisdiction in 1986 to accept the court's jurisdiction only on a case-by-case basis. Chapter XIV of the United Nations Charter authorizes the UN Security Council to enforce Court rulings. However, such enforcement is subject to the veto power of the five permanent members of the Council, which the United States used in the Nicaragua case. The ICJ is composed of fifteen judges elected to nine-year terms by the UN General Assembly and the UN Security Council from a list of people nominated by the national groups in the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The election process is set out in Articles 4–19 of the ICJ statute. Elections are staggered, with five judges elected every three years to ensure continuity within the court. Should a judge die in office, the practice has generally been to elect a judge in a special election to complete the term. No two judges may be nationals of the same country. According to Article 9, the membership of the Court is supposed to represent the "main forms of civilization and of the principal legal systems of the world". Essentially, that has meant common law, civil law and socialist law (now post-communist law). There is an informal understanding that the seats will be distributed by geographic regions so that there are five seats for Western countries, three for African states (including one judge of francophone civil law, one of Anglophone common law and one Arab), two for Eastern European states, three for Asian states and two for Latin American and Caribbean states. The five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (France, Russia, China, the United Kingdom, and the United States) always have a judge on the Court, thereby occupying three of the Western seats, one of the Asian seats and one of the Eastern European seats. The exception was China, which did not have a judge on the Court from 1967 to 1985 because it did not put forward a candidate. Article 6 of the Statute provides that all judges should be "elected regardless of their nationality among persons of high moral character" who are either qualified for the highest judicial office in their home states or known as lawyers with sufficient competence in international law. Judicial independence is dealt with specifically in Articles 16–18. Judges of the ICJ are not able to hold any other post or act as counsel. In practice, Members of the Court have their own interpretation of these rules and allow them to be involved in outside arbitration and hold professional posts as long as there is no conflict of interest. A judge can be dismissed only by a unanimous vote of the other members of the Court. Despite these provisions, the independence of ICJ judges has been questioned. For example, during the Nicaragua case, the United States issued a communiqué suggesting that it could not present sensitive material to the Court because of the presence of judges from Eastern bloc states.
Views: 12137 The Audiopedia
How To Read a Case in Law School
 
05:14
Executive Vice President and Provost of Temple University, JoAnne A. Epps, looks at the difference between everyday reading and reading for law school and offers advice on how to read through a case.
Views: 16287 Temple Law
Article III For Dummies: The Judiciary Explained
 
08:01
The Constitution for Dummies Series returns covering Article 3 of the Constitution, the Judicial Branch. This funky, well organized video lecture will make sure you are shipped out into the world with a clear understanding of the Constitutions language outlining the Judiciary. Subscribe to HipHughes History, it's stupid easy and free https://www.youtube.com/user/hughesdv?sub_confirmation=1&src_vid=hDjLSfWvNlQ&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_3651517591
Views: 128234 Hip Hughes
False dowry cases
 
03:47
#FalseDowryCaseInPakistan #FalseFamilyCase #DowryList #BridalGifts #ZeeshanAdil #LawyerOnlinePakistan #FamilyLawyerPakistan Zeeshan Hussain Adil Advocate High Court Lahore. FAMILY LAW BOOK PRICE RS. 500/- LAW OF WRITS PRICE RS. 1000/- SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT PRICE RS. 500/- click the link below to visit my blog for publications and book. http://www.pakistanilaws92.com/p/publications_18.html Via parcel. If you want to buy my books write message from your mobile type Book Title your address name and mobile number and send it to 0321-4730558. Please join me. My legal post group link. https://www.facebook.com/groups/135975917093870/ My law post page link. https://www.facebook.com/PaskistaniLaws92/ My personal page link. https://www.facebook.com/ZeeshanHussainAdil/ My law post whatsapp group. https://chat.whatsapp.com/CPouydicB9t2miFiMS2Cw8
Views: 2889 zeeshan adil
Mantra To Win The Court Cases - Mahakali Mantra मुकदमें में विजय प्राप्ति मंत्र
 
01:55
Mantra For Court Cases and Disputes ,कोर्ट कचहरी बाधा निवारण Mahakali Mantra has the power to destroy the enemies & win the court cases for you. (Find Free articles and mantra video on http://www.gurushakti.org.in) Growing up in a spiritual environment, under the strict guidance of his Guru and surrounded by mahatmas and devotees, Guru Moti Lal ji has been instrumental in providing solutions to many devotees in the world. He is a spiritual scientist and an evolved spiritual guide rejuvenating the knowledge of mantras and stotras to help people live problem free life and getting abundance For general queries you can mail him to [email protected] For booking a' Pooja' or 'Anushthan' or for specific 'Vashikaran' purposes you can mail him to [email protected] or call +919464380534 Find Free articles and mantra video on http://mantrascience.blogspot.in/ Powerful Baglamukhi Kavach To Destroy Enemies बगलामुखी कवच http://youtu.be/JRnb9NX52bs Powerful Shabar Hanuman Mantra for Success http://youtu.be/u3LE86r-yjA Powerfull Narasimha kavacham नृसिंहा कवच http://youtu.be/XJ_PS-HP6o4 Extremely Powerful Narayan Kavach श्री नारायण कवच http://youtu.be/LGDOqkOw5Ho Powerful Kali Shabar Mantra for Success http://youtu.be/xQydYo7Sij4 Extremely Powerful Narasimha Mantra To Destroy Enemies http://youtu.be/MGLT30u0gFc Extremely Powerful NAVGRAHA Stotram http://youtu.be/shhje6MULq8 Most Powerful Amogh Shiv Kavach http://youtu.be/ccEiukIvOrE Extremely Powerful Kali Mantra To Destroy Enemy http://youtu.be/XKSZl1Q6YA8 EXTREMELY POWERFUL VARAH KAVACH Mantra Science http://youtu.be/FzgabPs6f-8 Kali Mantra For Success शक्तिशाली वशीकरण Mantra Science http://youtu.be/BCCuD4hal_0 Apsara Urvashi Shabar Mantra http://youtu.be/9Bctj1z59JU
Views: 83252 mantrascience
8 Terrifying Courtroom Moments Caught on Tape
 
10:07
► Subscribe For Future Videos: http://bit.ly/1gnvQD2 Hit That Like Button If You Enjoyed! :D ► Instagram: Deburke321 ► My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Deburke321 ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Deburke321 ► Similar Top Tens: http://bit.ly/1W9hozh Music by Kevin MacLeod. Available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuNXo9Ed1dc&list=PL6A5E405DA65E5240 Sources: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article206440219.html http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2016/05/tiana_carruthers.html http://apmobile.worldnow.com/story/24619539/joshua-jones-pleads-guilty-in-murder-of http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/20120717michael-marin-life-death.html http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2016/06/16/19-year-old-man-sentenced-in-christmas-eve-slaying-of-detroit-musician/ https://abcnews.go.com/US/ohio-school-killer-tj-lane-snuck-killer-shirt/story?id=18774193 http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/mitchelle-blair-why-i-killed-my-kids http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/nikko-jenkins-sentenced-to-death-for-one-of-the-worst/article_3d0b067a-4545-11e7-92a1-8b9317b69244.html Thanks a million for watching, it means a lot :D
Views: 3941623 Deburke321
5 Types of Writs | Constitutional Remedies | Article 32 and Article 226
 
10:48
In today's Video lets discuss 5 types of Writs: Habeas Corpus Mandamus Certiorari Prohibition Quo Warranto Fundamental Rights are properly protected the constitutional machinery, their Guarantee is safeguarded by Supreme Court and High Court. Generally there are 4 main protections provided for Fundamental Rights - Article 13, Article 359, Article 32 and 226. The Supreme Court and High Courts have wide power to issue Writs for the Protection of Fundamental Rights. The Video Discusses:- 1. Powers under Article 32 and Article 226 - and their differences 2. 5 Types of Writs 3. Important Case Laws Understanding the concept of Writs is very important for every Law Student. Its an important topic for any Competitive law Exam such as NET 2018, CLAT 2019, Judiciary and Indian Polity for UPSC Preparation. I hope this Video helps you in Understanding Law and Preparation for various exams - Kindly Subscribe to my Channel, So that you Stay Updated with all the Legal Topics, Current Affairs and Recent Cases See you in the Next Class! Thank You and Bye-Bye! Playlist for Jurisprudence - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlijn... Playlist for Constitution - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri-Ei... Instagram: @priyajain2609
Views: 1177 Finology Legal
D.C. v. Heller  - Landmark Cases - Episode # 7
 
07:10
Until District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008, the Supreme Court had not tackled Second Amendment challenge since 1939. Justice Scalia wrote the opinion of the court and struck down a ban on handguns. This case continues to be the leading case surrounding our right to possess firearms. Questions and Comments welcome. Thanks for watching. Subscribe for more videos! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh4U7HXC73qzCAuhu2Kmg4Q New videos are uploaded every 3 days. Full Cases can be found at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2739870581644084946&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 Definitions: Issue - Question the court must answer. Dissent - An explicit disagreement by one or more judges with the decision of the majority on a case before them. Holding - courts ruling Affirmed - declare support, uphold Certiorari - order by which a higher court reviews a decision of a lower court Appeal - apply to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court Stare Decisis - policy of the court to follow or adhere to principles set-out by decisions in earlier cases Enjoin - a court directs, requires, commands, or admonishes Lets Connect: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Think-LegalEase-642007932608604/?skip_nax_wizard=true Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThinkLegalease Google+: https://plus.google.com/b/117094959243749648089/117094959243749648089/about?hl=en&pageId=117094959243749648089 Email suggested topics to: [email protected] The law discussed in this video is general in nature and is not legal advice. This video is purely intended for educational purposes. The video is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. You are highly encouraged to seek professional legal advice in your State should you find yourself dealing with the subject matter of this video. The subject matter is not specific to any individual or State law. The video is published for the sole use of education and it is solely based on the opinions and knowledge of the publisher. Sources: District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783, (2008) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/gunsuit.pdf http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/07-00290qp.pdf http://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2015/10/15/dick-heller-talks-heller-iii/ http://www.thefreedictionary.com
Views: 12800 Think LegalEase
5 Landmark Cases That Changed India's Governance: Golaknath, Keshvananda Bharti, etc. [UPSC CSE/IAS]
 
24:17
You can watch the entire course - "Daily Lectures Series by Roman Saini" here:- https://goo.gl/5dn4MG | Download the Unacademy Learning App from the Google Play Store here:- https://goo.gl/02OhYI 5 Supreme Court rulings that changed India's Governance and Constitution. Roman explains all the facts about them and the context behind them. Extremely important for aspirants of government examinations, especially UPSC CSE/IAS aspirants. The five cases covered are - Golaknath Case, Keshavnanda Bharti Case, Minerva Mills Case, Maneka Gandhi Case, and SR Bommai Case. For more lessons/courses on UPSC CSE Preparation, please visit:- https://unacademy.com/upsc-preparation/
Views: 308070 Unacademy
7 Landmark Court Cases that Changed Indian Laws
 
07:28
As is the case with everything else, a country's judicial system evolves with time. Here are Top 7 Landmark Court Cases that Changed Indian Laws . Subscribe Now ►http://bit.ly/Mindboggler Background Music : The Complex Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Views: 100548 Mind Boggler
Marbury vs. Madison: What Was the Case About? | History
 
03:38
What happened in the 1803 United States court case between William Marbury and James Madison? What affect did it have on the young nation? Subscribe for more from HISTORY: http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=historychannel Newsletter: https://www.history.com/newsletter Website - http://www.history.com Google+ - https://plus.google.com/+HISTORY/posts Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/History Twitter - https://twitter.com/history HISTORY Topical Video Season 1 Episode 1 Whether you're looking for more on American Revolution battles, WWII generals, architectural wonders, secrets of the ancient world, U.S. presidents, Civil War leaders, famous explorers or the stories behind your favorite holidays. HISTORY®, now reaching more than 98 million homes, is the leading destination for award-winning original series and specials that connect viewers with history in an informative, immersive, and entertaining manner across all platforms. The network’s all-original programming slate features a roster of hit series, epic miniseries, and scripted event programming. Visit us at HISTORY.com for more info.
Views: 120249 HISTORY
'Sovereign Citizens' Appear In Court
 
05:22
Eshleman and Rosondich were arrested for resisting arrest when they refused to exit their vehicle. The travelers also said they were on a religious pilgrimage and wanted to be lawyers. MEGAN SMITH/The Jackson Sun
Views: 1636188 The Jackson Sun
ecent business court cases
 
00:16
law schiol recent legal cases in the news universitys for law lawcon articles about laws news about laws what is legal address kanun com university college law wht is law articles on laws law legal definition attorneys lawyers law law pages court listings all about law definations of law institutional law laws made by government laws of the usa law om latest legal issues news legal who is the law law of laws recent business court cases legal news paper law schools in america ranking number of law schools in the us new law legal best legal news websites news about the law us legal news law college logo law related news articles law of om what islaw interesting law articles newspaper laws current events legal issues law of law college of law media portal legal stories in the news university schoo laws of the us news articles on law laws of us legal topics in the news what is a legal institution rules made by government laws law u of law school definiton of law what is the laws news articles about law legal news sites law firms news u law a law top us universities for law is the law what's a law the law is top legal news a law is the legal news where is the law the law page link legal law firm usa top law schools where did the word law originated recent legal news articles current events related to law law stories in the news what is alaw top law schoola top law school us law school top u of a faculty of law legal in the us
Views: 17 INTENT
Major Constitutional Cases -  Legal Aptitude /GK for CLAT DU LLB & other Law Exams
 
15:52
#Huge_Discount_on_Pendrive_Courses_Call_9580048004 Flat 60% Discount on Pendrive Courses Click here https://goo.gl/aTFK6Q to know more. Offer Valid till 28th November 2018 Start Live Chat Support https://goo.gl/s68PZ1 Download UPSCIQ Magazine - http://bit.ly/2DH1ZWq || Download All Videos PDFs - https://goo.gl/X8UMwF || Join StudyIQ on Telegram - https://goo.gl/xBR3g8 || UPSC/CSE 2019 - https://goo.gl/UrCD46 SSC & Bank - https://goo.gl/9LQ4Ai UPSC Optionals - https://goo.gl/rtmXRU State PSCs - https://goo.gl/FDB32q Defence Exams - https://goo.gl/UEmtRz SSC JE Exams - https://goo.gl/2WyU1Z RBI Grade B - https://goo.gl/PY32m6 NABARD Grade A - https://goo.gl/C6CzAL DMRC Exams - https://goo.gl/yDnvyf Insurance Exams - https://goo.gl/iLEFxf CLAT 2019 - https://goo.gl/Burjtj Railway Jobs - https://goo.gl/5KaL7h Teaching Jobs - https://goo.gl/q117TX UPSC Prelim 2019Test Series -https://goo.gl/zkCG51 Free PDFs - https://goo.gl/cJufZc || Free Quiz - https://goo.gl/wCxZsy || Free Video Courses - https://goo.gl/jtMKP9" Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Telegram - https://t.me/Studyiqeducation The Hindu Editorial Analysis - https://goo.gl/vmvHjG Current Affairs by Dr Gaurav Garg - https://goo.gl/bqfkXe UPSC/IAS Burning Issues analysis- https://goo.gl/2NG7vP World History for UPSC - https://goo.gl/J7DLXv Indian History - https://goo.gl/kVwB79 Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Follow Dr Gaurav Garg on Facebook - https://goo.gl/xqLaQm UPSC/IAS past papers questions - https://goo.gl/F5gyWH SSC CGL + IBPS Quantitative tricks - https://goo.gl/C6d9n8 English Vocabulary - https://goo.gl/G9e04H Reasoning tricks for Bank PO + SSC CGL- https://goo.gl/a68WRN Error spotting / Sentence correction https://goo.gl/6RbdjC Static GK complete- https://goo.gl/kB0uAo Complete GK + Current Affairs for all exams- https://goo.gl/MKEoLy World History - UPSC / IAS - https://goo.gl/kwU9jC Learn English for SSC CGL, Bank PO https://goo.gl/MoL2it Science and Technology for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/Jm4h8j Philosophy for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/FH9p3n Yojana Magazine analysis -https://goo.gl/8oK1gy History for SSC CGL + Railways NTPC - https://goo.gl/7939eV
Views: 66450 Study IQ education
Finding a Court Case in LexisNexis Academic
 
01:44
A short tutorial on how to search for court cases using the database LexisNexis Academic.
Views: 332 FoglerLibrary
APA for Court Cases
 
01:16
How to apply APA formatting to State and Supreme Court Cases Give us your feedback http://goo.gl/forms/Ly1mov7lyTUKVVnX2
Doctrine of Indoor Management By Advocate Sanyog Vyas
 
12:13
To Buy video Lectures in Pendrive, DVD, online, Android, Books, Test Series please visit our website https://sanyogvyaslawclasses.com/
Views: 125159 Sanyog Vyas Law Classes
Why YouTube Can Exist | Sony v. Universal
 
05:56
Want a specific SCOTUS case covered? Your idea gets picked when you donate on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.net/ Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt In episode 28 of Supreme Court Briefs, Universal Studios, Disney, and other media corporations sue Sony for copyright infringement after Sony creates this device that can record stuff so that viewers can watch it later. Check out cool primary sources here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1982/81-1687 Other sources used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/the-court-case-that-almost-made-it-illegal-to-tape-tv-shows/251107/ http://blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/legal-research/today-1984-supreme-court-decides-sony-betamax-case/ http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/17/opinion/la-ed-betamax-ruling-anniversary-20140117 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc. Photo credits: Sound effect credits: Punch sound effect by Mike Koenig Sony develops a new technology called Betamax. It was the first video tape recording form made widely available for the public. People could use this technology to, for the first time ever, record stuff from live TV or even from other recordings for future use. Now, eventually, Betamax would lose the of the late 1970s and early 1980s to its archenemy, the dreaded VHS. While Beta was a formidable opponent, VHS triumphed, until it eventually was defeated in another war to the great DVD. Anyway, for the first couple years, before VHS entered the scene, Betamax was living the dream, the next big thing. But many corporations in the film and television industries did not like this new technology so much. Universal Studios, the Walt Disney Company and other TV and film corporations sued Sony’s American-based operations in California District Court for copyright infringement. These corporations argued that Sony’s customers were using the Betamax recording devices to record copyrighted programs so they could view them later. The nerve! Two years later-man things can move slowly in court- the California District Court ruled in favor of Sony, arguing that recording for noncommercial home use fell under fair use guidelines, and that access to free public information was protected under the First Amendment under fair use. One major problem with fair use, however, is that it can be interpreted many ways, you know like the Bible, or the Constitution? Universal Studios and the rest appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court, who in 1981 reversed the lower court’s decision, saying that yes, Sony was contributing to copyright infringement by selling these Betamax machines. They argued the main purpose of Betamax was copying, and even suggested damages to be paid to the TV and film corporations and further legal restrictions on Betamax and similar home recording technologies like VHS. By this time, though, both Beta and VHS were selling like crazy. Sony of course appealed to the Supreme Court, who heard oral arguments on January 18, 1983. The Court really struggled with this one. And they’re weren’t divided politically, meaning this wasn’t your typical conservative/liberal divide. Perhaps they just had a hard time grasping the implications of this new technology. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion expecting the Court to rule against Sony and for Universal and the rest. However, he wrote the opinion as if it was a majority opinion. By sneakily doing this, he may have persuaded two justices, William Brennan and Byron White to come his way. On January 17, 1984, the Court finally announced its decision. It was 5-4, in favor of Sony. The Court argued that many broadcast copyright holders didn’t care if their programming was copied for home use. The most famous example of this was Fred Rogers or Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood fame. Rogers testified at the district court and said he was cool with it, saying it actually helped his show be seen more.
Views: 10883 Mr. Beat
In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!!
 
04:39
Claim your LIMITED .999 Silver Trump 2020 Coin at http://TrumpCoin2020.com SUB TO BACKUP CHANNEL HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7hGbKgaf_DK3w_gwQweICg?sub_confirmation=1 Sub to main Youtube Channel here: http://nnn.is/Sub-to-N3 Get on our Email list! http://nnn.is/email-newsletter-next-news Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. See the report here: https://youtu.be/VsTPksIswCU Read More/Source/Credit/FairUse: https://rwnofficial.com/in-historic-9-0-decision-supreme-court-just-shredded-democrats-yuge-2/ Share this to Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https://youtu.be/VsTPksIswCU Tweet This video: https://twitter.com/home?status=Must%20See!%20https%3A//youtu.be/VsTPksIswCU ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUPPORT THE NETWORK WITH THE LINKS BELOW! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Patreon $5/mo: http://nnn.is/monthly-gift-5 Donate with Paypal: https://nnn.is/give-once Give BTC: 13Hd1HFqS5CDLCMcFQPWu9wumubo6X2hSM Next News T-Shirt Shop: http://nnn.is/get-your-gear-here Got Kids or Grandkids? Take a break at our new Kids Channel: (( SUBSCRIBE )) http://bit.ly/sub-to-Banchi-Brothers Do your kids understand liberty? They will after reading this: https://goo.gl/bICMCr Learn How To Make REAL Money Every Day In The Markets here: https://TradeGeniusAcademy.com Restore YOUR Online Privacy here: https://HideWithGary.com Enter Promo Code: nextnews for 20% OFF ! Be Ready in ANY disaster. Stock up on Survival Food here: http://PrepareWithGary.com Claim the BEST travel safety device in the world here: http://PatriotCharger.com ---------------------------------------- FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL! --------------------------------------- https://Minds.com/NextNews https://Minds.com/GaryFranchi https://BitChute.com/channel/NextNewsNetwork https://Real.Video/channel/NextNewsNetwork http://Facebook.com/NextNewsNet http://Twitter.com/NextNewsNet http://Twitter.com/garyfranchi http://NextNewsNetwork.com Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Community Guidelines Disclaimer: The points of view and purpose of this video is not to bully or harass anybody, but rather share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject. #N3
Views: 172014 The Next News Network
International Law explained by Hesham Elrafei |  What are the sources of International Law?
 
02:36
What are the sources of International public law? Le droit international expliqué | Quelles sont les sources du droit international? By Hesham Elrafei https://www.linkedin.com/in/heshamelrafei Overview of the sources of international public law as stated in Article 38 of the international court of justice ICJ statute : treaty, customary law, courts decisions, jurisprudence and law principles. Sources of International Law , explained , simplified and visualized. Les sources du droit international public مصادر القانون الدولي وفقال لمادة 38 من النظام الأساسي لمحكمة العدل الدولية 1 What are the sources of international law? 2 The term ‘source of law’ refer to legal rules governing the international community. 3 Unlike national laws , where sources of law are specified in a norm superior to laws and regulations, usually a constitution, no such norm exists in international law. 4 The International Court of Justice, stipulated a catalogue of sources of international law, which is used when deciding legal disputes submitted before the world court. 5 the first source is international treaties, whether a general or particular treaty, a bilateral ,regional or multinational one, 6 a treaty is a binding international agreement. by which the countries are obliged to observe their contractual obligations. 7 the 2nd source is customary law. At the outset, international law was mainly constituted by customs. 8 which is by its nature, universal, whereas treaty law binds the parties to these treaties only 9 International custom consists of 2 elements: First is State practice, which means What generally States Do and Say. 10 Oppinio Juris is the 2nd element of customary law. It means that the state practice, has to be accepted as law, by the other states. 11 In addition to treaties and customs, other sources exist, such as Judicial decisions , juristic writings and general principles of law. 12 while they are not formal sources , they can still play an important role as an evidence of the law.
Views: 137600 LEX ANIMATA
Priya Varrier Gets Relief As Top Court Freezes Cases Against Her Over Song
 
02:00
This video is for entertainment purpose and this video is created on the bases of net articles. Some images used in this video is for reference purpose only. DON'T FORGET TO SUBSCRIBE NEWS FILMY HAI FOR MORE. THIS VIDEO IS ONLY FOR ENTERTAINMENT. _____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ I am here by declare that all Images use to make this video is from Google Search www.google.com . Google Advanced Search Is Used to Find all images, usage rights: free to use, share or modify . Like,Watch and Subscribe..Photos all are taken from Google Image search Category People & Blogs License Standard YouTube License
Views: 424 News Filmy Hai
AP Review Video #17: Presidential Amendments, Articles and Cases
 
03:57
AP Government http://www.learnerator.com/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=JAdams/
Views: 1154 Jeremy Adams
IPC - Indian Penal Code Important Sections - दरोगा भर्ती परीक्षा Sub inspector Police MP SI UP SI
 
13:12
#Huge_Discount_on_Pendrive_Courses_Call_9580048004 Flat 60% Discount on Pendrive Courses Click here https://goo.gl/aTFK6Q to know more. Offer Valid till 28th November 2018 Start Live Chat Support https://goo.gl/s68PZ1 Download UPSCIQ Magazine - http://bit.ly/2DH1ZWq || Download All Videos PDFs - https://goo.gl/X8UMwF || Join StudyIQ on Telegram - https://goo.gl/xBR3g8 || UPSC/CSE 2019 - https://goo.gl/UrCD46 SSC & Bank - https://goo.gl/9LQ4Ai UPSC Optionals - https://goo.gl/rtmXRU State PSCs - https://goo.gl/FDB32q Defence Exams - https://goo.gl/UEmtRz SSC JE Exams - https://goo.gl/2WyU1Z RBI Grade B - https://goo.gl/PY32m6 NABARD Grade A - https://goo.gl/C6CzAL DMRC Exams - https://goo.gl/yDnvyf Insurance Exams - https://goo.gl/iLEFxf CLAT 2019 - https://goo.gl/Burjtj Railway Jobs - https://goo.gl/5KaL7h Teaching Jobs - https://goo.gl/q117TX UPSC Prelim 2019Test Series -https://goo.gl/zkCG51 Free PDFs - https://goo.gl/cJufZc || Free Quiz - https://goo.gl/wCxZsy || Free Video Courses - https://goo.gl/jtMKP9" Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Telegram - https://t.me/Studyiqeducation The Hindu Editorial Analysis - https://goo.gl/vmvHjG Current Affairs by Dr Gaurav Garg - https://goo.gl/bqfkXe UPSC/IAS Burning Issues analysis- https://goo.gl/2NG7vP World History for UPSC - https://goo.gl/J7DLXv Indian History - https://goo.gl/kVwB79 Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Follow Dr Gaurav Garg on Facebook - https://goo.gl/xqLaQm UPSC/IAS past papers questions - https://goo.gl/F5gyWH SSC CGL + IBPS Quantitative tricks - https://goo.gl/C6d9n8 English Vocabulary - https://goo.gl/G9e04H Reasoning tricks for Bank PO + SSC CGL- https://goo.gl/a68WRN Error spotting / Sentence correction https://goo.gl/6RbdjC Static GK complete- https://goo.gl/kB0uAo Complete GK + Current Affairs for all exams- https://goo.gl/MKEoLy World History - UPSC / IAS - https://goo.gl/kwU9jC Learn English for SSC CGL, Bank PO https://goo.gl/MoL2it Science and Technology for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/Jm4h8j Philosophy for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/FH9p3n Yojana Magazine analysis -https://goo.gl/8oK1gy History for SSC CGL + Railways NTPC - https://goo.gl/7939eV
Views: 344413 Study IQ education
ECHR Lecture
 
22:07
A video lecture on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This lecture discusses the background to the Convention, the different types of rights (absolute, limited and qualified) as well as many of the key articles contained in the Convention.
Views: 21902 marcuscleaver
The Responsibility of International Organizations and the International Law Commission
 
01:34:06
The Responsibility of International Organizations and the International Law Commission: A Conversation between Professors Georg Nolte, member of the International Law Commission, and José E. Alvarez, NYU The responsibility of international organizations has been an important concern of the international community for some years. In 2011, the International Law Commission adopted the "Draft Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations." These articles will be debated in the UN General Assembly's Sixth Committee. In addition, cases before the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights (in particular Kadi/Behrami/Al-Skeini/Al-Jedda) have raised significant questions about the human rights obligations of the United Nations as well as member states cooperating with UN actions. Such questions have arisen in the course of implementing UN sanctions or undertaking UN peacekeeping operations. Have the ILC and international judges asked the right questions and reached the right answers with respect to allocating responsibility on the UN? What is the International Law Commission's role in resolving such issues? Prof. Georg Nolte, member of the International Law Commission, and Prof. J.E. Alvarez, the Herbert and Rose Rubin Professor of Law at NYU School of Law, addressed these issues in the form of a conversation at New York University School of Law.
Views: 8866 NYU School of Law
Supreme Court of the United States Procedures: Crash Course Government and Politics #20
 
06:54
This week Craig Benzine talks about what happens when a case makes it to the Supreme Court of the United States (or the SCOTUS). We're going to focus on court procedure today. We talk about how to petition to get your case heard, how written arguments, or briefs, are made, what actually happens on the courtroom floor, and of course the variety of ways the SCOTUS issues opinions on cases. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 463445 CrashCourse
I JUST SUED THE SCHOOL SYSTEM !!!
 
06:01
THE PEOPLE VS THE SCHOOL SYSTEM Don't forget to like, comment and SUBSCRIBE: https://goo.gl/3bBv52 For more inspirational content, watch: I Quit https://goo.gl/CS3TQK Dear Future Generations: Sorry https://goo.gl/GPxKvu The Future I Believe In https://goo.gl/3WHe9V BOOK REFERENCES. If you are interested in learning more on the subject I would suggest a few books to get started 1) Weapons of Mass Instruction by John Taylor Gatto 2) Creative Schools by Ken Robinson 3) I Love Learning; I Hate School by Susan D Blum 4) The One World SchoolHouse by Salman Khan Check out the audio only version here: https://soundcloud.com/prince-ea/we-just-sued-the-school-system How do YOU think we can create a better future for learning. Go here and share your thoughts on the topic! http://www.bit.ly/2ciqj4z Music by: http://djsneverendingstory.com/ Filmed and Edited by http://shareability.com/ Directed By Joel Bergvall and Joe Lombardi (https://vimeo.com/aztechfilm) Awesome Animation and Graphics By Hodja Berlev (https://www.facebook.com/Neonbyte-382305275259022/) Casting and Assistant Production By: Spencer Sharp (https://www.facebook.com/dispencery/?hc_ref=SEARCH) Join My Motivational List and get Exclusive Videos, Discounts and Updates http://princeea.com/exclusive Prince EA http://www.facebook.com/princeea http://www.twitter.com/PrinceEa // @PrinceEa http://www.princeea.com http://princeea.tumblr.com
Views: 13812704 Prince Ea
Tim Bilecki - The Court Martial Process
 
05:22
https://www.bileckilawgroup.com/court-martial-defense/articles-of-the-ucmj/ Court Martial Lawyer Tim Bilecki explains the court martial process. The military Court Martial process and system can be daunting, especially to the uninitiated. Court Martial defense lawyer Tim Bilecki was recently interviewed in Los Angeles, California and was asked about how the Court Martial process works and if it is really a search for the truth. Transcripts from that interview are below. We hope that this helps answer your own questions about the military justice system. If you are ready to discuss your case with one of the military defense attorneys at Bilecki & Tipon, LLLC, call us at (808) 275-4620 or visit our websites at http://www.bileckilawgroup.com and http://www.militaryandcriminallaw.com to see how we can help with your case. As former soldiers service members ourselves, we know just how difficult this time is for you and we want to be there to help in any way that we can. Interviewer Is a Court Martial really a "search for the truth"? Bilecki We’d all like to believe that a Court Martial is a "search for the truth," but the reality is: anyone who’s sat in on a Court Martial, or anyone who’s sat as an accused in a trial, knows that it’s not. Unfortunately, military prosecutors—they want to win, and oftentimes, they want to win at all cost. So, what do they do? They often put in just part of the evidence. They only show the jury the evidence that makes the accused look guilty. They often don’t put in exculpatory evidence. Interviewer What advise do you give to someone who’s been accused but not charged yet? Bilecki If you’ve been accused of a crime or if you have already been charged, you need to understand that CID/NCIS/OSI, they already think you’re guilty—and the command probably thinks you’re guilty as well. You need to be very, very careful with what you do because they’re trying to build a case against you. If the alleged victim in a case calls you on the phone, it’s probably a pre-text or recorded phone call. If you put things on social media, CID is probably looking for it. If there’s any type of forensic evidence or exculpatory evidence that you have (whether it’s on a cellphone or any of the type of electronic media), you need to preserve it because don’t count on CID or NCIS to go and find it, and prove you innocent. Interviewer What do you tell someone who has just had charges Preferred against them? Bilecki You know, when someone calls me and says they’ve had charges Preferred against them, I say, "Get ready for a fight. This is going to be a marathon and not a sprint. We’ve got to get ready. We need to assemble the team, investigate the case, and get ready to wage a complete and utter war against the prosecution." Interviewer What is the purpose of an Article 32 hearing? Bilecki The Article 32 is a preliminary hearing where an independent investigating officer is appointed to hear the evidence of the case. As a service member, you have a right to have representation at the Article 32. This is the first chance you’re going to get, and maybe one of the only chances, to cross examine the witnesses against you, to learn the defects and the strengths of the government’s case, and to understand what cards the government has. There are a multitude of strategies that the Defense can utilize, but the most important thing is understanding how the Article 32 plays in to the trial strategy. You want a civilian attorney that can go into the Article 32, dominate the Article 32, and perhaps get your case dismissed before it ever goes to trial.
Views: 6455 Bilecki & Tipon, LLLC
Congress for Dummies -- Article 1 of the Constitution
 
20:22
The second in the Constitution for Dummies series, in this lecture HipHughes takes you through Article I of the Constitution examining all ten sections outlining Legislative Powers. The Constitution Explained Series. 48 Videos, 6.5 Hours Long. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLi3U-nPPrbS5d-juhFwo3hTBso0gq2sUZ
Views: 172702 Hip Hughes
In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!!
 
04:49
Please Help Me To 100,000 Sub : American Patriot : https://bit.ly/2yOF8Xi SUB TO BACKUP CHANNEL HERE : https://bit.ly/2DuahBo In Historic 9-0 Decision, Supreme Court Just Shredded Democrats – YUGE!!!! Sometimes the Supreme Court gets it right and in a rarity, leveling a historic 9-0 decision, SCOTUS just sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering. This allows controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm elections just the way they are. That’s great news for Republicans and Democrats are incensed over it. They had their hearts set on redistricting voting districts… i.e. partisan gerrymandering. They will literally do anything to steal an election which includes gerrymandering, having the dead vote and recruiting illegal aliens and refugees to vote. Those are just a few of their favorite tricks. You have to ask yourself if Dems are willing to illegally and unethically unseat a sitting president simply because he is a Republican and they don’t like him, how far will they go to rig an election? As far as they can possibly get away with, sometimes with the help of government agencies. They bend the rules just as far as they can and had planned to do so in the midterms as well. Their blue wave is more of a drip and now this. Things are just not looking good for leftists in the upcoming elections. This decision is a huge one from SCOTUS. CNN reported: “The Supreme Court on Monday sidestepped two major cases concerning partisan gerrymandering, allowing controversial district maps to stand and be used in this fall’s midterm elections. The 9-0 ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in a Wisconsin case is a blow to Democrats who argued the Republican-drawn maps prevented fair and effective representation by diluting voters’ influence and penalizing voters based on their political beliefs.” Democrats won a challenge in a lower court, but the Supreme Court’s decision on the Wisconsin case Monday would limit who can bring such cases in the future. A second case from Maryland involved the Republicans challenging a district map drawn by Democrats. The justices said that a lower court did not act improperly in leaving the map in place. In an unsigned opinion with no dissents, the justices said that the challengers failed to reach the high bar of showing “irreparable harm” that would be necessary for a preliminary injunction to block the map. “Even if we assume — contrary to the findings of the District Court — that plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits of their claims, the balance of equities and the public interest tilted against their request for a preliminary injunction,” the court said. The court’s opinion in the Maryland case means that for now, the justices will leave having to answer whether the court can set a standard for when politicians go too far in drawing lines to benefit one party over another for another day. But it also makes it harder to bring it before the high court. This issue is sure to come before the court again, however, and it is one of the reasons it is so important that President Trump select another constitutional originalist to sit on the court when the next vacancy comes up. For instance, Kennedy was seen as the swing vote on this case. Rumor has it he will retire sometime this summer and President Trump will fill his spot. This could solidly weigh the Supreme Court in favor of conservatives for the first time in many years. On Monday, Justice Anthony Kennedy stayed relatively silent. The last time the Supreme Court heard a major partisan gerrymandering case, in 2004, four conservative justices said the issue should be decided by the political branches, not the courts. But Kennedy was unwilling to bar all future claims of injury from partisan gerrymanders. That stance may soon be moot. It would seem a whole raft of rulings are going against Democrats and their manipulation of voting. Judges ruled this last week that you can wear clothing with political expressions to the voting booth. That’s a win for free speech, something the left abhors. Copyright Disclaimer: Citation of articles and authors in this report does not imply ownership. Works and images presented here fall under Fair Use Section 107 and are used for commentary on globally significant newsworthy events. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Community Guidelines Disclaimer: The points of view and purpose of this video is not to bully or harass anybody, but rather share that opinion and thoughts with other like-minded individuals curious about the subject. Read More/Source/Credit/FairUse:https://bit.ly/2zcbGIB #In#Historic#9#0#Decision#Supreme#Court#Just#Shredded#Democrats#YUGE
Views: 57095 American Patriot
EU Law - Free Movement of Goods - Article 30
 
15:26
An EU law video lecture on Article 30 TFEU that prohibits customs duties when goods cross a border. The lecture also briefly examines Article 110 on internal taxation. Watch the second part at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKKrystHa9M
Views: 34097 marcuscleaver
FIDA in court over article 26 over the Abortion debate
 
37:22
FIDA in court over article 26 over the Abortion debate SUBSCRIBE to our YouTube channel for more great videos: https://www.youtube.com/ Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/KTNNews Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/KTNNewsKenya For more great content go to http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/ktnnews and download our apps: http://std.co.ke/apps/#android KTN News is a leading 24-hour TV channel in Eastern Africa with its headquarters located along Mombasa Road, at Standard Group Centre. This is the most authoritative news channel in Kenya and beyond.
Views: 281 KTN News Kenya
Civil Rights Court Cases Song
 
01:53
A song about the civil rights court cases by Ben and Claudia to the tune of "Love is an Open Door"
Views: 730 Dan Jeffers
How strong is cancer patient's case against Roundup-maker Monsanto?
 
03:25
A California man dying of cancer appeared in court, claiming a popular weed killer made him sick. In the first case of its kind to reach trial, Dewayne Johnson is suing Monsanto, the maker of Roundup. The 46-year-old blames his 2014 cancer diagnosis on Roundup's active ingredient, glyphosate. He's one of thousands of people nationwide, reportedly accusing Monsanto of failing "to exercise reasonable care to warn of the dangerous risks associated with use and exposure" to glyphosate. Monsanto denies the allegations. CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman joins "CBS This Morning" to discuss the strength of the plaintiff's case. Subscribe to the "CBS This Morning" Channel HERE: http://bit.ly/1Q0v2hE Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: http://bit.ly/1T88yAR Watch the latest installment of "Note to Self," only on "CBS This Morning," HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Sh8XlB Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: http://bit.ly/1Q7NGnY Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: http://on.fb.me/1LhtdvI Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: http://bit.ly/1Xj5W3p Follow "CBS This Morning" on Google+ HERE: http://bit.ly/1SIM4I8 Get the latest news and best in original reporting from CBS News delivered to your inbox. Subscribe to newsletters HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T Get your news on the go! Download CBS News mobile apps HERE: http://cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! http://bit.ly/1OQA29B Delivered by Norah O’Donnell and Gayle King, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
Views: 22434 CBS This Morning
T.N. violates Supreme Court orders, 72 cases filed for bursting crackers beyond time limit
 
02:58
The number of cases that have been filed in Tamil Nadu for bursting crackers and not following the Supreme Court allotted time. Our correspondent Pramod Madhav gets more details. Listen in! SUBSCRIBE NOW for more such videos ►http://bit.ly/2LesD8T For More Updates ► http://www.mirrornow.in Like us on Facebook ► https://www.facebook.com/MirrorNow Follow us on Twitter ► https://twitter.com/MirrorNow
Views: 318 Mirror Now
Recent Second Amendment Cases in Court
 
14:37
Second Amendment scholar Dave Kopel joins host Jon Caldara to talk about two recent Second Amendment cases in federal court.
Views: 86 IITV
How to transfer Jammu & Kashmir Courts cases to outside court and vice versa.
 
12:45
जम्मू-कश्मीर न्यायालय के केसस बाहर के राज्य में कैसे ट्रांसफर हो सकते हैं? #LawExpressLLB How to transfer Jammu & Kashmir Courts cases to outside court and vice versa ... The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has held that Supreme Court can, by invoking Article 32, 136 and 142 of the Constitution is empowered to transfer a case from a Court in the State of Jammu and Kashmir to a Court outside the State or vice versa. The five Judges Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dr. T.S. Thakur, Justices Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and R. Banumathi further made an important observation that Access to Justice is guaranteed to citizens by Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Constitution Bench was answering reference to it, which arose from Transfer Petitions, eleven seeking transfer of civil cases from or to the State of Jammu and Kashmir while the remaining two seek transfer of criminal cases from the State to Courts outside that State. The provisions of Articles 32, 136 and 142 are, therefore, wide enough to empower this Court to direct such transfer in appropriate situations, no matter Central Code of Civil and Criminal Procedures do not extend to the State nor do the State Codes of Civil and Criminal Procedure contain any provision that empowers this court to transfer cases.” Judgement download: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzXilfcxe7yuaU9zZGJSSHdTbGM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe to #LawExpressLLB Channel for latest updates on New Concepts and related videos. You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/abdulteli786 Follow us on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DrAbdulJabbar4U Follow us on Twitter : https://twitter.com/drabduljabbar4u Contact Email Adrees ---- [email protected]
Views: 35 Law Express LLB
UPSC/Civil Services General Studies Paper 2 Question Paper 2018 Discussion by Saurabh Part 5
 
41:18
The video analysis highlights the approach to tackle questions.GS paper 2 needs very different approach.Your answer must include Supreme court cases, Articles and better to mention name of judges in any judgement.Secondly segregating the questions in 3-4 parts is a key to fetch good marks.Thirdly keywords used in the question must be repeated in your answer.At Dusky board we are focussing on enhancing marks rather than burdening with knowledge. Subscribe and keep tuned to Duskyboard for latest updates, free videos lectures, latest updates in UPSC, course videos and test series.
Views: 84 DuskyBoard
Parker Thorson Attorneys At Law in California, Brain Injury Cases
 
00:38
Parker Thorson Attorneys At Law in California, Brain Injury Cases
How to remove Federal,State,District Court Cases from Google
 
03:09
http://www.webcide.com/how-to-monitor-your-online-reputation- How to remove Federal,State,District Court Cases from Google http://www.webcide.com/how-to-remove-negative-blogs-from-google So what can you do if news articles are pain your online reputation? Depending on the specifics of the situation, you may be powerful to get the article removed or unpublished. As Google advises, you need to contactor the publisher expressly. Getting a newspaper to remove calumnious information is possible (though not calm), and when that information is deleted, Google will automatically impede exhibition it in search results. Failing that approach, there are also tactics you can use to decrease the visibility of misleading news articles online. The most immediate and permanent way to remove a bad pry into result from Google is to completely kill it from the Internet. Eradicating the link means Google no longer has the bad result to link to, and anyone who searches for your name won’t see it again in the future. Once it’s gone, you’re done, the night terror is over. Take a deep breath. But, getting links removed from the Internet is far easier said than done. Online regard services require a human touch. Whether its to remove negative online content like articles or blog posts, clean up search results, or improve online reviews and ratings. Software helps, but people drive success. We know that other businesses and individuals have distinct reputation management needs. Our staff researched and revisal dozens of reputation management services, and came up with the once we meditate are best for both businesses and individuals. We propound services to businesses both small and large from a spacious variety of industries and fields. Our exclusive solutions are focused not just on public perception, but also on our intelligent of buying drivers for specific products. Public perception is vitally important, but our proprietary solutions are also focused on what drives sales for your products or services.
Views: 50 Julian Goldman
Hein's ScholarCheck in the U.S. Supreme Court Library
 
01:58
This is a brief demonstration of Hein's ScholarCheck tool in the U.S. Supreme Court Library in HeinOnline. You can now view the CitedBy counts for Supreme Court cases found in the U.S. Reports. This means that when you run a search in the U.S. Supreme Court Library, any search result linking directly to a case from a U.S. Reports volume will display the number of times that the case is cited by articles from HeinOnlines Law Journal Library.
Views: 831 HeinOnline
Impeachment cases’ verdict up to constitutional court — consultative committee
 
02:58
The Senate will no longer act as an impeachment tribunal once the proposed new constitution gets approval. Here’s Mai Bermudez to tell us why. For more videos: http://www.untvweb.com/video/ For News Update, visit: http://www.untvweb.com/news/ Check out our official social media accounts: http://www.facebook.com/UNTVNewsRescue http://www.twitter.com/untvnewsrescue https://www.youtube.com/UNTVNewsandRescue Instagram account - @UNTVLife Feel free to share but do not re-upload.
Brown v. Board of Education | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute
 
04:09
Brown v. Board of Education was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1954 after Linda Brown, an African American student in Kansas, was denied access to the white-only schools nearby her house. Future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall was the lawyer for the case, and argued that segregated schools were inherently unequal. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Linda Brown and declared segregation unconstitutional. This is one of the landmark cases that led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. For Lessons to go along with this video, check out the links below: Click here for a lesson on the Brown v. Board of Education case. http://voicesofhistory.org/supreme-court-document-based-questions/brown-v-board-education-1954/ Click here for a lesson about the Civil Rights Movement https://www.docsoffreedom.org/readings/the-civil-rights-movement Click here for a lesson on the Little Rock Nine. http://voicesofhistory.org/heroes-and-villains/elizabeth-eckford-little-rock-nine-respect/ Click here for a lesson on the Plessy v. Ferguson case. http://voicesofhistory.org/supreme-court-document-based-questions/plessy-v-ferguson-1896/
ARBITRATION LAW CASES PART1...Synopsis of Arbitration Act 1940
 
30:04
ARBITRATION LAW CASE PART 1....Synopsis of Arbitration Act 1940
The Judiciary - Article III Powers
 
09:44
A brief overview of the Federal Court System with emphasis on the structure of the system and the type of jurisdiction possessed by courts at different levels.
Views: 1112 LearnUSGovt
EU Law - Freedom of Establishment and Services
 
22:26
The distinction between establishment and services is based on the idea that establishment is more permanent whereas services are more temporary in nature. Establishment mainly falls under Art. 49 with 49(1) allowing for primary and secondary establishment and (2) prohibiting unequal or discriminatory treatment. The law in this area is directly effective as per Reyners [1974]. Equivalent qualifications across member states are interpreted broadly as per Heylens [1987] and also Directive 2005/36 Meanwhile article 49(2) has been broadened beyond discrimination to include any unjustified restriction on the freedom of establishment. The main case in this are is Gebhard [1995] that allows for restrictions only if they meet four criteria: 1) Non-discriminatory 2) Justified 3) Needed to secure an objective 4) Don't go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective A national can rely on Art. 49 with respect to their own member state only when they have exercised the freedom of movement themselves as per Knoors [1979] Article 54 states companies should be treated in the same way as individuals and although company law can vary from state to state the ECJ has placed a lot of focus on achieving the overall objective of freedom of establishment as seen in Centros [1999] and Überseering [2002]. However once a company is established in a Member State they are then subject to that country's rules as regards incorporation etc. as per Daily Mail [1988] and Cartesio [2008] The liberalisation provided by Art. 54 means that it can be difficult to crack down on tax avoidance as seen in Cadbury Schweppes [2006]. Freedom of services is based on the temporary nature of the work rather than the infrastructure or, as per Commission v Portugal [2010], the period of time. Art. 57 loosely defines services and 58 excludes other services that are covered in other parts of the treaty. Art. 56 also has direct effect as per Van Binsbergen [1974]. Similarly there also has to be an inter-state element as seen in Deliège [2000] Also covered is the freedom to receive services; Luisi & Carbone [1984] The service does have to be provided for remuneration and this line can become blurred in relation to certain healthcare systems that are a hybrid between user and government payments Some controversial services such as abortion, gambling and marijuana can still be considered services (Grogan [1991]) but can be subject to national rules that provide a proportional and non-discriminatory restriction (Zenatti [1999]). Taking a broad definition it is even possible that certain social benefits may also fall within the definition; Cowan [1989]. Art. 62 allows for restrictions on policy, security and health grounds. Beyond this Van Binsbergen [1974] sets out the conditions for any restriction imposed by a Member State: 1) Pursuit of a legitimate public interest 2) Applied without discrimination 3) Proportionate 4) Respects fundamental rights (Carpenter [2002]) This freedom can be controversial as it allows greater liberalisation in the labour market at the expense of employee rights. This came to a head in Laval [2007] although this judgment has been tempered somewhat by the Rome I Regulation. Restrictions on tax grounds can be allowed to prevent fraud but not for other, broader reasons; Danner [2002]. Non-discriminatory restrictions can also be caught if they are a hinderance to the freedom of services (Alpine Investments [1995]) and Gebhard [1995] also applies within this context. The Bolkenstein Directive sought to achieve greater harmonisation by focusing on the country of origin but after protest this was watered down and so only mainly deals with a range of procedural and administrative issues.
Views: 8225 marcuscleaver

Picture of a resume cover letter
Program specialist cover letter examples
Polizeiwissenschaft newsletter formats
Nyu poly admissions essay for catholic high school
Annotated bibliography mla example 2014 jeep