Home
Search results “Court cases articles”
Major Landmark Cases of Supreme Court 2018 | Latest Judgements of 2018
 
13:16
In the year 2018 - the Supreme Court had been in Headlines for so many Reasons. Here in this Video I will be taking you Firstly through the Decisions made in 5 Landmark Supreme Court Cases made in the year 2018 and after that I will also be talking about 10 other major judgements of 2018 that made it to the headlines. 1. Sabarimala Verdict: Indian Young Lawyer Association v State of Kerala The Supreme Court said that the Sabarimala temple's customary religious practice, which prohibits the entry of women, violates fundamental rights guaranteed to women by the Indian Constitution. 2. Passive Euthanasia Case : Common Cause v Union of India & Anr The constitutional bench of India recognised that right to life and liberty under Article 21 includes within its purview right to die with dignity. 3. AADHAR Case: Justice K S Puttaswamy v Union of India The Supreme Court recognised that right to privacy is a fundamental right and Aadhar Act is constitutionally valid. 4. Decriminalisation of Homosexuality : Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India - https://youtu.be/1GGsUFrcuQY 5. Adultery Case : Joseph Shine v. Union Of India - In this case the Supreme Court through 4:1 majority struck down the Gender Discriminatory Section 497 of IPC I have made an attempt to discuss all the important points in these cases as simply as possible! 🙋‍♀️ I hope this Video Helps you in staying up to date with all the Recent Judgments of the Supreme Court - Kindly Like and Subscribe to My Channel! ^Article 12 - https://youtu.be/KfaM_kopdx0 ^Article 13 - https://youtu.be/mZ9pNndZcUs ^Article 14 - https://youtu.be/YEAoixRez_Q ^Article 15 - https://youtu.be/S1i06Jm2Kz4 ^Article 16 - https://youtu.be/wvgEFRJ02dE ^Article 19 - https://youtu.be/sY5koIrpHrw Instagram - @finologylegal Thank You!
Views: 74400 Finology Legal
Article 14 Fundamental Right Indian Constitution | With Case Laws | 14(1) & 14(2)
 
09:07
Hello Everybody! Welcome to Finology Legal! In this Video I am discussing Article 14 Fundamental Right of Indian Constitution- Right to Equality, that is article 14 of the Indian constitution with Case Laws- I will be discussing Rule of Law and Indian Constitution Art 14 (1) - Equality before law in Indian Constitution Art 14 (2) - Equal Protection of Laws in Indian Constitution Along with important case laws of Article 14 which deals with: Old Doctrine of equality which was propounded in the case of State of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara New Doctrine which talks about the dynamic concept of equality, propounded in the case of E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu I have tried to simplify and explain the development and expansion of the fundament right to Equality which is conceptualized into Article 14 with Case law on Indian Constitution ^Article 12 - https://youtu.be/KfaM_kopdx0 ^Article 13 - https://youtu.be/mZ9pNndZcUs ^Article 15 - https://youtu.be/S1i06Jm2Kz4 ^Article 16 - https://youtu.be/wvgEFRJ02dE ^Article 19 - https://youtu.be/sY5koIrpHrw ^Recent Supreme Court Judgement on Section 377 - https://youtu.be/1GGsUFrcuQY Do comment below your Feedback, Doubts and Suggestions! Instagram: finologylegal
Views: 70574 Finology Legal
How to Read a Case: And Understand What it Means
 
15:25
Jennifer Rosa, Michigan State University College of Law How to Read a Case: And Understand What it Means Based in part on article by Julie Novkov at Universtiy at Albany, SUNY Supported by the Uncommon Individual Foundation. Website- http://uif.org/#home Twitter- https://twitter.com/UIFworld LinkedIn-http://goo.gl/AAx6sw Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/uncommonindi... Please join us in the conversation at https://twitter.com/LegalEDweb
Views: 153278 LegalEDweb
Landmark Cases on Constitution | Indian Polity Important Cases | 2019
 
27:31
Hello! In this video we will discuss about some important landmark cases on constitution. For better understanding i have divided these cases in different categories like: Our 1st category is preamble. So you tell me, what is the significance of preamble? Is it a part of the constitution? Can it be amended? Can any law by legislature be invalidates, only on the basis of preamble? Lets know about these cases. -Re Berubari Case -Golaknath v. State of Punjab -Keshvananda Bharti v. State of Kerala -Indra Nehru Gandhi case -Minerva Mills v. UOI important cases on Art 368 important cases relating to fundamental rights. Our 2nd category is fundamental rights which are discussed from Article 12 to 35. Let have a look: -Marbury v. Madison - L. CHandrakumar v. Union of India -, A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras -Romesh Thapar v State of Madras -State of Gujarat v. Ambika Mills -Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner -state of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara -Anwar Ali v. State of West Bengal -Randhir Singh v. Union of India -E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu -D.P. Joshi v. State of M.P. -Champkam Dorairajan v. State of Madras -T. Devadasn case -N.M.Thomas v. State of Kerala -Akhil Bhartiya Soshit Karmachari v. Union of India -Indra Swahney v. Union of India -Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras -Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India -A.K.Gopalan case -ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla - Maneka Gandhi v. UOI -K.N. Puttaswamy v. UOI -Mohini Jain v. Case of Karnataka Article 25 to 28 deals with minority rights and secularism. Lets check these two cases: -S.R. Bommai v. Union of India -Md. Hamid Qureshi v. State of Bihar Next category is judiciary. See, appointment of Judges of Supreme Court is dealt in article 124 and appointment of high court’s judges is dealt in article 217. What procedure has been laid down under these articles? Now what is the meaning of world consultation in both of these articles. We have 3 landmark verdicts for this: - S.P.Gupta v. Union of India (First Judges Case) -Supreme Court Advocate on Record Case (Second Judges case) - In re Special Reference (Third Judges Case) Next category is emergency. In topic of Emergency. In the topic of emergency, amendments ar more important than the cases. Lets look at two different cases. -Minerva mills v. Union of India -S.R. Bommai v. Union of India Next category is of amendments under article 368: -Shankari prasad case -Sajjan Singh’s case -Golaknath v. UOI -Keshavananda Bharti V. State of Kerala I hope that you liked this video - these cases are very important with respect to NET 2019, CLAT 2019 and also for basic understanding of Indian Constitution and Indian Polity. Kindly subscribe to my channel to keep receiving such updates. In the next video, we will discuss some of the important recent judgments. Here is a PDF with sample MCQ`s: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Y8eBwwpMyo0Wk5NHvnXrZj3LrTcJ-vO/view?usp=sharing Do let me know in the comment box, how did you find this Video! Instagram: finologylegal
Views: 19863 Finology Legal
Keshavananda Bharati Case | 11 important cases of Supreme Court - CivilsPrep
 
20:21
Presented by CivilsPrep. For Daily UPSC (IAS) Current Affairs, notes downloads, Daily Questions, IAS ARC Reports synopsis, NCERT and Weekend Practice tests visit www.civilsprep.com. Visit our site for latest ARC report analysis and current affairs. Answer the question related to this video article and get expert guidance on how to write essay answer the right way and take mock IAS tests. CivilsPrep.com is on Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/civilsprepias and Twitter - https://twitter.com/civilsprep
Mantra To Win The Court Cases - Mahakali Mantra मुकदमें में विजय प्राप्ति मंत्र
 
01:55
Mantra For Court Cases and Disputes ,कोर्ट कचहरी बाधा निवारण Mahakali Mantra has the power to destroy the enemies & win the court cases for you. (Find Free articles and mantra video on http://www.gurushakti.org.in) Growing up in a spiritual environment, under the strict guidance of his Guru and surrounded by mahatmas and devotees, Guru Moti Lal ji has been instrumental in providing solutions to many devotees in the world. He is a spiritual scientist and an evolved spiritual guide rejuvenating the knowledge of mantras and stotras to help people live problem free life and getting abundance For general queries you can mail him to [email protected] For booking a' Pooja' or 'Anushthan' or for specific 'Vashikaran' purposes you can mail him to [email protected] or call +919464380534 Find Free articles and mantra video on http://mantrascience.blogspot.in/ Powerful Baglamukhi Kavach To Destroy Enemies बगलामुखी कवच http://youtu.be/JRnb9NX52bs Powerful Shabar Hanuman Mantra for Success http://youtu.be/u3LE86r-yjA Powerfull Narasimha kavacham नृसिंहा कवच http://youtu.be/XJ_PS-HP6o4 Extremely Powerful Narayan Kavach श्री नारायण कवच http://youtu.be/LGDOqkOw5Ho Powerful Kali Shabar Mantra for Success http://youtu.be/xQydYo7Sij4 Extremely Powerful Narasimha Mantra To Destroy Enemies http://youtu.be/MGLT30u0gFc Extremely Powerful NAVGRAHA Stotram http://youtu.be/shhje6MULq8 Most Powerful Amogh Shiv Kavach http://youtu.be/ccEiukIvOrE Extremely Powerful Kali Mantra To Destroy Enemy http://youtu.be/XKSZl1Q6YA8 EXTREMELY POWERFUL VARAH KAVACH Mantra Science http://youtu.be/FzgabPs6f-8 Kali Mantra For Success शक्तिशाली वशीकरण Mantra Science http://youtu.be/BCCuD4hal_0 Apsara Urvashi Shabar Mantra http://youtu.be/9Bctj1z59JU
Views: 89901 mantrascience
EU Law - Free Movement of Goods - Article 30
 
15:26
An EU law video lecture on Article 30 TFEU that prohibits customs duties when goods cross a border. The lecture also briefly examines Article 110 on internal taxation. Watch the second part at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKKrystHa9M
Views: 38448 marcuscleaver
7 Landmark Court Cases that Changed Indian Laws
 
07:28
As is the case with everything else, a country's judicial system evolves with time. Here are Top 7 Landmark Court Cases that Changed Indian Laws . Subscribe Now ►http://bit.ly/Mindboggler Background Music : The Complex Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com) Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Views: 104758 Mind Boggler
Brown v. Board of Education | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute
 
04:09
Brown v. Board of Education was a case brought to the Supreme Court in 1954 after Linda Brown, an African American student in Kansas, was denied access to the white-only schools nearby her house. Future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall was the lawyer for the case, and argued that segregated schools were inherently unequal. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Linda Brown and declared segregation unconstitutional. This is one of the landmark cases that led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. For Lessons to go along with this video, check out the links below: Click here for a lesson on the Brown v. Board of Education case. http://voicesofhistory.org/supreme-court-document-based-questions/brown-v-board-education-1954/ Click here for a lesson about the Civil Rights Movement https://www.docsoffreedom.org/readings/the-civil-rights-movement Click here for a lesson on the Little Rock Nine. http://voicesofhistory.org/heroes-and-villains/elizabeth-eckford-little-rock-nine-respect/ Click here for a lesson on the Plessy v. Ferguson case. http://voicesofhistory.org/supreme-court-document-based-questions/plessy-v-ferguson-1896/
Views: 128717 Bill of Rights Institute
ecent business court cases
 
00:16
law schiol recent legal cases in the news universitys for law lawcon articles about laws news about laws what is legal address kanun com university college law wht is law articles on laws law legal definition attorneys lawyers law law pages court listings all about law definations of law institutional law laws made by government laws of the usa law om latest legal issues news legal who is the law law of laws recent business court cases legal news paper law schools in america ranking number of law schools in the us new law legal best legal news websites news about the law us legal news law college logo law related news articles law of om what islaw interesting law articles newspaper laws current events legal issues law of law college of law media portal legal stories in the news university schoo laws of the us news articles on law laws of us legal topics in the news what is a legal institution rules made by government laws law u of law school definiton of law what is the laws news articles about law legal news sites law firms news u law a law top us universities for law is the law what's a law the law is top legal news a law is the legal news where is the law the law page link legal law firm usa top law schools where did the word law originated recent legal news articles current events related to law law stories in the news what is alaw top law schoola top law school us law school top u of a faculty of law legal in the us
Views: 9 INTENT
ECHR Lecture
 
22:07
A video lecture on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This lecture discusses the background to the Convention, the different types of rights (absolute, limited and qualified) as well as many of the key articles contained in the Convention.
Views: 25544 marcuscleaver
(ENG) ECHR - Film on the European Court of Human Rights (English Version)
 
14:30
Aimed at a wide audience, the film on the European Court of Human Rights explains how the Court works, describes the challenges faced by it and shows the scope of its activity through examples from the case-law. The film will be soon issued in other official languages of the member States of the Council of Europe.
8 Terrifying Courtroom Moments Caught on Tape
 
10:07
► Subscribe For Future Videos: http://bit.ly/1gnvQD2 Hit That Like Button If You Enjoyed! :D ► Instagram: Deburke321 ► My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Deburke321 ► Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Deburke321 ► Similar Top Tens: http://bit.ly/1W9hozh Music by Kevin MacLeod. Available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuNXo9Ed1dc&list=PL6A5E405DA65E5240 Sources: http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/crime/article206440219.html http://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/index.ssf/2016/05/tiana_carruthers.html http://apmobile.worldnow.com/story/24619539/joshua-jones-pleads-guilty-in-murder-of http://archive.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/20120717michael-marin-life-death.html http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2016/06/16/19-year-old-man-sentenced-in-christmas-eve-slaying-of-detroit-musician/ https://abcnews.go.com/US/ohio-school-killer-tj-lane-snuck-killer-shirt/story?id=18774193 http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/mitchelle-blair-why-i-killed-my-kids http://www.omaha.com/news/crime/nikko-jenkins-sentenced-to-death-for-one-of-the-worst/article_3d0b067a-4545-11e7-92a1-8b9317b69244.html Thanks a million for watching, it means a lot :D
Views: 5248979 Deburke321
5 Landmark Cases That Changed India's Governance: Golaknath, Keshvananda Bharti, etc. [UPSC CSE/IAS]
 
24:17
You can watch the entire course - "Daily Lectures Series by Roman Saini" here:- https://goo.gl/5dn4MG | Download the Unacademy Learning App from the Google Play Store here:- https://goo.gl/02OhYI 5 Supreme Court rulings that changed India's Governance and Constitution. Roman explains all the facts about them and the context behind them. Extremely important for aspirants of government examinations, especially UPSC CSE/IAS aspirants. The five cases covered are - Golaknath Case, Keshavnanda Bharti Case, Minerva Mills Case, Maneka Gandhi Case, and SR Bommai Case. For more lessons/courses on UPSC CSE Preparation, please visit:- https://unacademy.com/upsc-preparation/
Views: 358668 Unacademy
How to use Nexis Uni to find law review articles
 
07:10
This tutorial will show you how to use the database Nexis Uni to find law review articles for your research.
How to remove Federal,State,District Court Cases from Google
 
03:09
http://www.webcide.com/how-to-monitor-your-online-reputation- How to remove Federal,State,District Court Cases from Google http://www.webcide.com/how-to-remove-negative-blogs-from-google So what can you do if news articles are pain your online reputation? Depending on the specifics of the situation, you may be powerful to get the article removed or unpublished. As Google advises, you need to contactor the publisher expressly. Getting a newspaper to remove calumnious information is possible (though not calm), and when that information is deleted, Google will automatically impede exhibition it in search results. Failing that approach, there are also tactics you can use to decrease the visibility of misleading news articles online. The most immediate and permanent way to remove a bad pry into result from Google is to completely kill it from the Internet. Eradicating the link means Google no longer has the bad result to link to, and anyone who searches for your name won’t see it again in the future. Once it’s gone, you’re done, the night terror is over. Take a deep breath. But, getting links removed from the Internet is far easier said than done. Online regard services require a human touch. Whether its to remove negative online content like articles or blog posts, clean up search results, or improve online reviews and ratings. Software helps, but people drive success. We know that other businesses and individuals have distinct reputation management needs. Our staff researched and revisal dozens of reputation management services, and came up with the once we meditate are best for both businesses and individuals. We propound services to businesses both small and large from a spacious variety of industries and fields. Our exclusive solutions are focused not just on public perception, but also on our intelligent of buying drivers for specific products. Public perception is vitally important, but our proprietary solutions are also focused on what drives sales for your products or services.
Views: 21 Julian Goldman
Here's What Happened When Rhode Island Accidentally Legalized Prostitution...
 
12:03
Support this content w/ a Paid subscription @ http://DeFrancoElite.com Watch Yesterday's PDS: https://youtu.be/jXiMRecJHHk Watch The Previous Morning Deep Dive: https://youtu.be/sEwERswlMus ———————————— Watch ALL the Morning Shows: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLHcsGizlfLMVTPwyQHClD_b9L5DQmLQSE ———————————— Follow Me On ———————————— TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PhillyD FACEBOOK: http://on.fb.me/mqpRW7 INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/phillydefranco/ ———————————— Sources/Important Links: ———————————— https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/502/1342/1512140/ http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/BillText/BillText19/HouseText19/H5354.htm http://scunning.com/august_2017.pdf https://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20190218/editorial-lets-not-revive-prostitution-horror https://www.providencejournal.com/news/content/20141114-5-31-2009-how-r.i.-opened-the-door-to-prostitution---broken-legal-barriers-made-public-nuisance-a-private-act.ece https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/10492.pdf https://caselaw.findlaw.com/ri-supreme-court/1255769.html https://humantraffickinghotline.org/state/rhode-island https://www.havocscope.com/prostitution-revenue-by-country/ https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/159/8/778/91471 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238432021_The_Missing_MissingToward_a_Quantification_of_Serial_Murder_Victimization_in_the_United_States https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3508959/ ———————————— Wanna send us stuff? ATTN: Philip DeFranco - Rogue Rocket 4804 Laurel Canyon Blvd. Box - 760 Valley Village, CA 91607 ———————————— Wanna listen on the go? -ITUNES: http://PDSPodcast.com -SOUNDCLOUD: https://soundcloud.com/thephilipdefrancoshow ________________________ Edited by: Jason Mayer Produced by: Amanda Morones, Elissa Chojnicki Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Elissa Chojnicki ———————————— #DeFranco #RhodeIsland #Prostitution ————————————
Views: 545473 Philip DeFranco
D.C. v. Heller  - Landmark Cases - Episode # 7
 
07:10
Until District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008, the Supreme Court had not tackled Second Amendment challenge since 1939. Justice Scalia wrote the opinion of the court and struck down a ban on handguns. This case continues to be the leading case surrounding our right to possess firearms. Questions and Comments welcome. Thanks for watching. Subscribe for more videos! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh4U7HXC73qzCAuhu2Kmg4Q New videos are uploaded every 3 days. Full Cases can be found at: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2739870581644084946&q=heller&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 Definitions: Issue - Question the court must answer. Dissent - An explicit disagreement by one or more judges with the decision of the majority on a case before them. Holding - courts ruling Affirmed - declare support, uphold Certiorari - order by which a higher court reviews a decision of a lower court Appeal - apply to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court Stare Decisis - policy of the court to follow or adhere to principles set-out by decisions in earlier cases Enjoin - a court directs, requires, commands, or admonishes Lets Connect: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Think-LegalEase-642007932608604/?skip_nax_wizard=true Twitter: https://twitter.com/ThinkLegalease Google+: https://plus.google.com/b/117094959243749648089/117094959243749648089/about?hl=en&pageId=117094959243749648089 Email suggested topics to: [email protected] The law discussed in this video is general in nature and is not legal advice. This video is purely intended for educational purposes. The video is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. You are highly encouraged to seek professional legal advice in your State should you find yourself dealing with the subject matter of this video. The subject matter is not specific to any individual or State law. The video is published for the sole use of education and it is solely based on the opinions and knowledge of the publisher. Sources: District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783, (2008) https://www.oyez.org/cases/2007/07-290 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/gunsuit.pdf http://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/07-00290qp.pdf http://www.americas1stfreedom.org/articles/2015/10/15/dick-heller-talks-heller-iii/ http://www.thefreedictionary.com
Views: 14933 Think LegalEase
Remove Court Cases online
 
00:56
Remove Court Cases online
Civil Rights Court Cases Song
 
01:53
A song about the civil rights court cases by Ben and Claudia to the tune of "Love is an Open Door"
Views: 804 Dan Jeffers
How to use Nexis Uni to find Supreme Court cases
 
05:03
This tutorial will show you how to use the database Nexis Uni to find Supreme Court cases for your research.
Family court cases
 
02:17
A brief sketch on family cases, plz comment on video waiting ur feedback.. Like and share... Thanks
Views: 322 Malik Law Books
Major Constitutional Cases -  Legal Aptitude /GK for CLAT DU LLB & other Law Exams
 
15:52
❗BIG HOLI Sale 💥Get FLAT 60% Discount on various Govt. Exams Pendrive Courses. Offer Valid till 23rd March '19 Only. Click here http://bit.ly/2QcdLOd OR Call 95-8004-8004 Start a LIVE chat for Any course related query - http://bit.ly/2qWhdOI StudyIQ's Top Selling Pendrive Courses - http://bit.ly/2BBcwQe UPSC/CSE 2019 - https://goo.gl/UrCD46 SSC & Bank - https://goo.gl/9LQ4Ai UPSC Optionals - https://goo.gl/rtmXRU State PSCs - https://goo.gl/FDB32q Defence Exams - https://goo.gl/UEmtRz SSC JE Exams - https://goo.gl/2WyU1Z RBI Grade B - https://goo.gl/PY32m6 NABARD Grade A - https://goo.gl/C6CzAL DMRC Exams - https://goo.gl/yDnvyf Insurance Exams - https://goo.gl/iLEFxf CLAT 2019 - https://goo.gl/Burjtj Railway Jobs - https://goo.gl/5KaL7h Teaching Jobs - https://goo.gl/q117TX UPSC Prelim 2019Test Series -https://goo.gl/zkCG51 #Big_HOLI_Sale #Pendrive_Courses #Call_9580048004 Videos PDFs - https://goo.gl/X8UMwF || Join StudyIQ on Telegram - https://goo.gl/xBR3g8 UPSCIQ - A Monthly Magazine for UPSC IAS http://bit.ly/2DH1ZWq We're HIRING, Apply Now - http://bit.ly/2PY1sVK Free PDFs - https://goo.gl/cJufZc || Free Quiz - https://goo.gl/wCxZsy || Free Video Courses - https://goo.gl/jtMKP9" Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Telegram - https://t.me/Studyiqeducation The Hindu Editorial Analysis - https://goo.gl/vmvHjG Current Affairs by Dr Gaurav Garg - https://goo.gl/bqfkXe UPSC/IAS Burning Issues analysis- https://goo.gl/2NG7vP World History for UPSC - https://goo.gl/J7DLXv Indian History - https://goo.gl/kVwB79 Follow us on Facebook - https://goo.gl/iAhPDJ Follow Dr Gaurav Garg on Facebook - https://goo.gl/xqLaQm UPSC/IAS past papers questions - https://goo.gl/F5gyWH SSC CGL + IBPS Quantitative tricks - https://goo.gl/C6d9n8 English Vocabulary - https://goo.gl/G9e04H Reasoning tricks for Bank PO + SSC CGL- https://goo.gl/a68WRN Error spotting / Sentence correction https://goo.gl/6RbdjC Static GK complete- https://goo.gl/kB0uAo Complete GK + Current Affairs for all exams- https://goo.gl/MKEoLy World History - UPSC / IAS - https://goo.gl/kwU9jC Learn English for SSC CGL, Bank PO https://goo.gl/MoL2it Science and Technology for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/Jm4h8j Philosophy for UPSC/IAS - https://goo.gl/FH9p3n Yojana Magazine analysis -https://goo.gl/8oK1gy History for SSC CGL + Railways NTPC - https://goo.gl/7939e
Views: 71313 Study IQ education
Top 10 Cold Cases That Were Finally Solved
 
10:05
Top 10 Cold Cases That Were Finally Solved Subscribe: http://goo.gl/Q2kKrD // Have a Top 10 idea? Submit it to us here! http://watchmojo.com/my/suggest.php Better late than never. From Jessica Lyn Keen’s murder, to Minnie and Edward Maurin’s wrongful death, to the Susan Schwarz secrets, these cold cases went unsolved… until now. WatchMojo counts down 10 cold cases that were finally solved. Check out our other videos of the Yet Another Top 10 Unsolved Murder Mysteries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIsgH6DQkao, the Top 10 Unsolved Internet Mysteries: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIE5Ei6v14A, and the Top 10 Deep Sea Mysteries That Will Freak You Out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WTUcWxPsYA. #10: Jessica Lyn Keen (1991) #9: Minnie and Edward Maurin (1985) #8: Diane Maxwell (1969) #7: Richard Phillips and Milton Curtis (1957) #6: Roy McCaleb (1985) #5: Susan Schwarz (1979) #4: John List’s Family (1971) #3, #2 & #1??? Watch on WatchMojo: http://www.WatchMojo.com Special thanks to our users Marlon Jacques, Strider Xanthos, Diana Bail, and Kurtsymon Cruz for suggesting this idea! Check out the voting page at https://www.watchmojo.com/suggest/Top+10+Cold+Cases+That+Were+Finally+Solved. Our Magazine!! Learn the inner workings of WatchMojo and meet the voices behind the videos, articles by our specialists from gaming, film, tv, anime and more. VIEW INSTANTLY: http://goo.gl/SivjcX WatchMojo's Social Media Pages http://www.Facebook.com/WatchMojo http://www.Twitter.com/WatchMojo http://instagram.com/watchmojo Get WatchMojo merchandise at shop.watchmojo.com WatchMojo’s ten thousand videos on Top 10 lists, Origins, Biographies, Tips, How To’s, Reviews, Commentary and more on Pop Culture, Celebrity, Movies, Music, TV, Film, Video Games, Politics, News, Comics, Superheroes. Your trusted authority on ranking Pop Culture.
Views: 802475 WatchMojo.com
American slave court cases | Wikipedia audio article
 
00:32
This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article: American slave court cases 00:00:07 undefined Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago. Learning by listening is a great way to: - increases imagination and understanding - improves your listening skills - improves your own spoken accent - learn while on the move - reduce eye strain Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone. You can find other Wikipedia audio articles too at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuKfABj2eGyjH3ntPxp4YeQ You can upload your own Wikipedia articles through: https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." - Socrates SUMMARY ======= The following is a list of court cases in the United States concerning slavery.
Views: 1 wikipedia tts
Why YouTube Can Exist | Sony v. Universal
 
05:56
Want a specific SCOTUS case covered? Your idea gets picked when you donate on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/iammrbeat Mr. Beat's band: http://electricneedleroom.net/ Mr. Beat on Twitter: https://twitter.com/beatmastermatt In episode 28 of Supreme Court Briefs, Universal Studios, Disney, and other media corporations sue Sony for copyright infringement after Sony creates this device that can record stuff so that viewers can watch it later. Check out cool primary sources here: https://www.oyez.org/cases/1982/81-1687 Other sources used: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betamax https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/the-court-case-that-almost-made-it-illegal-to-tape-tv-shows/251107/ http://blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/legal-research/today-1984-supreme-court-decides-sony-betamax-case/ http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/17/opinion/la-ed-betamax-ruling-anniversary-20140117 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Universal_City_Studios,_Inc. Photo credits: Sound effect credits: Punch sound effect by Mike Koenig Sony develops a new technology called Betamax. It was the first video tape recording form made widely available for the public. People could use this technology to, for the first time ever, record stuff from live TV or even from other recordings for future use. Now, eventually, Betamax would lose the of the late 1970s and early 1980s to its archenemy, the dreaded VHS. While Beta was a formidable opponent, VHS triumphed, until it eventually was defeated in another war to the great DVD. Anyway, for the first couple years, before VHS entered the scene, Betamax was living the dream, the next big thing. But many corporations in the film and television industries did not like this new technology so much. Universal Studios, the Walt Disney Company and other TV and film corporations sued Sony’s American-based operations in California District Court for copyright infringement. These corporations argued that Sony’s customers were using the Betamax recording devices to record copyrighted programs so they could view them later. The nerve! Two years later-man things can move slowly in court- the California District Court ruled in favor of Sony, arguing that recording for noncommercial home use fell under fair use guidelines, and that access to free public information was protected under the First Amendment under fair use. One major problem with fair use, however, is that it can be interpreted many ways, you know like the Bible, or the Constitution? Universal Studios and the rest appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court, who in 1981 reversed the lower court’s decision, saying that yes, Sony was contributing to copyright infringement by selling these Betamax machines. They argued the main purpose of Betamax was copying, and even suggested damages to be paid to the TV and film corporations and further legal restrictions on Betamax and similar home recording technologies like VHS. By this time, though, both Beta and VHS were selling like crazy. Sony of course appealed to the Supreme Court, who heard oral arguments on January 18, 1983. The Court really struggled with this one. And they’re weren’t divided politically, meaning this wasn’t your typical conservative/liberal divide. Perhaps they just had a hard time grasping the implications of this new technology. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion expecting the Court to rule against Sony and for Universal and the rest. However, he wrote the opinion as if it was a majority opinion. By sneakily doing this, he may have persuaded two justices, William Brennan and Byron White to come his way. On January 17, 1984, the Court finally announced its decision. It was 5-4, in favor of Sony. The Court argued that many broadcast copyright holders didn’t care if their programming was copied for home use. The most famous example of this was Fred Rogers or Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood fame. Rogers testified at the district court and said he was cool with it, saying it actually helped his show be seen more.
Views: 15516 Mr. Beat
How to transfer Jammu & Kashmir Courts cases to outside court and vice versa.
 
12:45
जम्मू-कश्मीर न्यायालय के केसस बाहर के राज्य में कैसे ट्रांसफर हो सकते हैं? #LawExpressLLB How to transfer Jammu & Kashmir Courts cases to outside court and vice versa ... The Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has held that Supreme Court can, by invoking Article 32, 136 and 142 of the Constitution is empowered to transfer a case from a Court in the State of Jammu and Kashmir to a Court outside the State or vice versa. The five Judges Bench comprising of Chief Justice of India Dr. T.S. Thakur, Justices Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, A.K. Sikri, S.A. Bobde, and R. Banumathi further made an important observation that Access to Justice is guaranteed to citizens by Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The Constitution Bench was answering reference to it, which arose from Transfer Petitions, eleven seeking transfer of civil cases from or to the State of Jammu and Kashmir while the remaining two seek transfer of criminal cases from the State to Courts outside that State. The provisions of Articles 32, 136 and 142 are, therefore, wide enough to empower this Court to direct such transfer in appropriate situations, no matter Central Code of Civil and Criminal Procedures do not extend to the State nor do the State Codes of Civil and Criminal Procedure contain any provision that empowers this court to transfer cases.” Judgement download: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BzXilfcxe7yuaU9zZGJSSHdTbGM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe to #LawExpressLLB Channel for latest updates on New Concepts and related videos. You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/abdulteli786 Follow us on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DrAbdulJabbar4U Follow us on Twitter : https://twitter.com/drabduljabbar4u Contact Email Adrees ---- [email protected]
Views: 41 Law Express LLB
Supreme Court of the United States Procedures: Crash Course Government and Politics #20
 
06:54
This week Craig Benzine talks about what happens when a case makes it to the Supreme Court of the United States (or the SCOTUS). We're going to focus on court procedure today. We talk about how to petition to get your case heard, how written arguments, or briefs, are made, what actually happens on the courtroom floor, and of course the variety of ways the SCOTUS issues opinions on cases. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 508653 CrashCourse
Supreme Court cases of the American Civil War | Wikipedia audio article
 
03:31
This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article: Supreme Court cases of the American Civil War 00:00:18 1 Pre-war 00:01:13 2 During the war 00:02:19 3 Post-war Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago. Learning by listening is a great way to: - increases imagination and understanding - improves your listening skills - improves your own spoken accent - learn while on the move - reduce eye strain Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone. You can find other Wikipedia audio articles too at: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuKfABj2eGyjH3ntPxp4YeQ You can upload your own Wikipedia articles through: https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." - Socrates SUMMARY ======= A number of cases were tried before the Supreme Court of the United States during the period of the American Civil War. These cases focused on wartime civil liberties, and the ability of the various branches of the government to alter them. The following cases were among the most significant.
Views: 0 wikipedia tts
Right to Travel in Court - All Charges Dismissed (Study Moors) !
 
25:39
Disclaimer: We do not 'own' this video, nor do we know the Man defending himself at court in the video ! We do not believe that the man in court 'identifies' with any Moorish Movements in America ! We are 're-posting' (or sharing) this video for 'Educational Purposes' and is 'NOT' intended for uneducated (or Non Compos Mentis) peoples to regurgitate or attempt to re-enact in Court (Because it will go south) but to study ! All Rights and Liberties reserved: Fair Use United States Republic Constitution 1789: Amendment - 1: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. United Nations - Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948: Article 19 - Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. United Nations - Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People 2007 (Signed by President Barack Obama in 2010): Article 16 - Sections 1 & 2: 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish their own media in their own languages and to have access to all forms of non-indigenous media without discrimination. 2. States shall take effective measures to ensure that State-owned media duly reflect indigenous cultural diversity. States, without prejudice to ensuring full freedom of expression, should encourage privately owned media to adequately reflect indigenous cultural diversity. & Articles - 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 & 37 sections 1 & 2
Views: 137284 Moorish American 720
Gary Mayerson’s law review article makes a case for a reexamination of the generalization issue.
 
01:19
Gary Mayerson’s law review article makes the case for a careful reexamination of the generalization issue. To read the article go to https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/nyls_law_review/vol63/iss1/4/
Views: 166 Gary Mayerson
Legal Citation: How to Cite U.S. Supreme Court Cases, by Lori S. Kornblum, J.D.
 
10:37
Attorney Lori S. Kornblum shows you how to cite U.S. Supreme Court cases with parallel citations. Created for MATC (Milwaukee, WI) Paralegal program, an ABA approved program. (This is not official Bluebook form because it uses parallel citations.) Created with TechSmith Snagit for Google Chrome™ http://goo.gl/ySDBPJ
Views: 5756 Lori Kornblum
AP Review Video #17: Presidential Amendments, Articles and Cases
 
03:57
AP Government http://www.learnerator.com/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=JAdams/
Views: 1161 Jeremy Adams
Civil Rights & Liberties: Crash Course Government #23
 
07:56
Today, Craig is going to give you an overview of civil rights and civil liberties. Often these terms are used interchangeably, but they are actually very different. Our civil liberties, contained in the Bill of Rights, once only protected us from the federal government, but slowly these liberties have been incorporated to protect us from the states. We’ll take a look at how this has happened and the supreme court cases that got us here. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All attributed images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
Views: 601436 CrashCourse
Police Brutality in America: Cases, Facts, Statistics, Articles, History, Lawyers (2000)
 
01:09:05
Police brutality is the abuse of authority by the unwarranted infliction of excessive force by personnel involved in law enforcement while performing their official duties. The term is also applied to abuses by corrections personnel in municipal, state and federal penal facilities including military prisons. While the term police brutality is usually applied in the context of causing physical harm, it may also involve psychological harm through the use of intimidation tactics beyond the scope of officially sanctioned police procedure. In the past, those who engaged in police brutality may have acted with the implicit approval of the local legal system, e.g. during the Civil Rights era. In the modern era, individuals who engage in police brutality may do so with the tacit approval of their superiors or they may be rogue officers. In either case, they may perpetrate their actions under color of law and, more often than not, engage in a subsequent cover-up of their illegal activity. The word brutality has several meanings; the sense used here (savage cruelty) was first used in 1633.[1] The term police brutality has been in use since at least 1833 when it appeared in the London paper The Poor Man's Guardian.[2] Efforts to combat police brutality focus on various aspects of the police subculture, and the aberrant psychology which may manifest itself when individuals are placed in a position of absolute authority over others. Beyond police departments and DAs, mechanisms of government oversight have gradually evolved. The Rodney King case triggered the creation of the Independent Commission on the Los Angeles Police Department, informally known as the Christopher Commission, in 1991. The commission, mandated to investigate the practices of the LAPD, uncovered disturbing patterns of misconduct and abuse, but the reforms it recommended were put on hold. Meanwhile, media reports revealed a frustration in dealing with systemic abuse in other jurisdictions as well, such as New York and Pittsburgh. Selwyn Raab of the New York Times wrote about how the "Blue Code of Silence among police officers helped to conceal even the most outrageous examples of misconduct."[32] Within this climate, the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 was created, which authorized the Attorney Manager to "file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights."[33] As of January 31, 2003, the Department of Justice has used this provision to negotiate reforms in twelve jurisdictions across the U.S. (Pittsburgh Bureau of Police, Steubenville Police Department, New Jersey State Police, Los Angeles Police Department, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department, Highland Park, Illinois Police Department, Cincinnati Police Department, Columbus Police Department, Buffalo Police Department, Mount Prospect, Illinois Police Department, Seattle Police Department, and the Montgomery County, Maryland Police Department).[34] Data obtained by The Associated Press showed a racial disparity in officers' use of stun guns. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Police_brutality_in_the_United_States
Views: 1297 Way Back
Uncertain Justice: The Supreme Court and the Constitution
 
01:18:05
For the nation’s 227th Constitution Day Laurence Tribe, one of the nation’s pre-eminent scholars of Constitutional Law at Harvard University, discusses his newest book Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution with Randall Kennedy. Is the Roberts Court really the “least dangerous” branch of our federal government, as Alexander Hamilton opined in Federalist Paper No. 78? Tribe argues that this Supreme Court is shaking the foundation of the nation’s laws and reinterpreting the meaning of the Constitution. Laurence Tribe is Carl M. Loeb University Professor and Professor of Constitutional Law at Harvard University. In addition to teaching Constitutional Law for more than 40 years, he has helped write the constitutions of South Africa, the Czech Republic, and the Marshall Islands; has argued dozens of cases in the U.S. Supreme Court, including the first argument in Bush v. Gore; and was appointed in 2010 by President Obama and Attorney General Holder to serve as the first Senior Counselor for Access to Justice. Professor Tribe has written 115 books and articles, including American Constitutional Law, the most frequently cited treatise on the U.S. Constitution. His current book Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution examines the implications of recent controversial Supreme Court decisions. Randall Kennedy is Michael R. Klein Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. His areas of interest include contracts; civil rights and civil liberties; race and the law; and the U.S. Supreme Court. He is the author of 6 books and numerous articles about the law, including Persistence of the Color Line: Racial Politics and the Obama Presidency. His most recent book is For Discrimination: Race, Affirmative Action, and the Law.
Views: 697 WGBHForum
List of International Court of Justice cases | Wikipedia audio article
 
02:04
This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_International_Court_of_Justice_cases 00:00:43 1 List of cases 00:01:47 2 See also Listening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language only began at around 3200 BC, but spoken language has existed long ago. Learning by listening is a great way to: - increases imagination and understanding - improves your listening skills - improves your own spoken accent - learn while on the move - reduce eye strain Now learn the vast amount of general knowledge available on Wikipedia through audio (audio article). You could even learn subconsciously by playing the audio while you are sleeping! If you are planning to listen a lot, you could try using a bone conduction headphone, or a standard speaker instead of an earphone. Listen on Google Assistant through Extra Audio: https://assistant.google.com/services/invoke/uid/0000001a130b3f91 Other Wikipedia audio articles at: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wikipedia+tts Upload your own Wikipedia articles through: https://github.com/nodef/wikipedia-tts "There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance." - Socrates SUMMARY ======= This is a list of contentious cases and advisory opinions brought to the International Court of Justice since its creation in 1946. 165 cases have been entered onto the General List for consideration before the court. The jurisdiction of the ICJ is limited. Only states have standing to bring a compulsory claim against another state, and then only with the consent of the responding state. However, certain United Nations bodies and agencies such as the UN General Assembly have the power to submit questions for advisory opinions. Although these advisory opinions are not binding under international law, they do provide the ICJ's interpretation of what international law is.
Views: 3 wikipedia tts
Dunya TV-Family Court Cases Karachi
 
01:33
Dunya TV-Family Court Cases Karachi
Views: 609 Dunya News
INDIAN POLITY IMPORTANT CASES AND  JUDGEMENTS GIVEN BY SUPREME COURT|| TECH 2 AUTO GADGET
 
04:47
INDIAN POLITY IMPORTANT CASES AND JUDGEMENTS GIVEN BY SUPREME COURT|| TECH 2 AUTO GADGET
Views: 351 TECH 2 AUTO GADGET
Why People Are Freaking Out On Cardi B, Apple's SCOTUS Problem, & Ukraine Russia Spiraling...
 
19:16
How is it only Tuesday?! AGH. Brace yourself for a 19 minute show… Thanks SeatGeek for sponsoring the video! Get $20 off tix w/ code PHIL: http://SeatGeekPhil.com (Restrictions Apply) Check out the last PDS: https://youtu.be/BqvFcbG20Ag Latest Bonus Video: https://youtu.be/Ai7eQgmbM5Y ———————————— Follow Me On: ———————————— TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PhillyD FACEBOOK: http://on.fb.me/mqpRW7 INSTAGRAM: https://instagram.com/phillydefranco/ ———————————— Today in Awesome: ———————————— YouTube Premium Student Discount: https://www.youtube.com/premium/student Disney’s Artemis Fowl Trailer: https://youtu.be/wXlBep9uFjI Lil Yachty Goes Undercover :https://youtu.be/hiuDpCrdbi8 Maddie Ziegler Fact Checks Beauty Tutorials :https://youtu.be/m7mEdpZj3jc Lin Manuel Miranda: https://youtu.be/agJBELpUgkg Honest Trailers Elf: https://youtu.be/Mlc7TXsJLpQ Netflix Ultraman: https://youtu.be/UXOG3pZfGOc Secret Link: https://twitter.com/Genius/status/1067496582969520138 ———————————— Important Links/Sources: ———————————— Apple’s App Store Under Fire in Supreme Court Case: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/26/supreme-court-appears-skeptical-of-apples-arguments-in-app-store-monopoly-case.html http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/apple-v-pepper/ https://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2018/17-204_32q3.pdf https://www.wsj.com/articles/apples-app-store-under-fire-in-supreme-court-case-1543254841 https://www.foxnews.com/tech/apple-faces-supreme-court-in-app-store-monopoly-battle Jameela Jamil Calls Out Celebs Promoting Detox Tea https://www.someecards.com/entertainment/entertainment/jameela-jamil-detox-tea-cardi-b-flat-tummy-co/ https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/a25319149/cardi-b-claps-back-jameela-jamil/ https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/celebrity-selfies/why-this-selfie-from-iggy-azalea-was-labelled-exploitative/news-story/4a9facc41c684b1a8d48d066ac0ab6b4 Ukraine - Russia Sea Clash: https://www.npr.org/2018/11/26/670746252/ukraine-considers-martial-law-after-russia-seizes-its-ships-near-crimea https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-russia/russia-fires-on-and-seizes-ukrainian-ships-near-annexed-crimea-idUSKCN1NU0DL https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/what-martial-law-in-ukraine-could-mean-for-nation.html http://tass.com/world/1032682 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/25/world/europe/ukraine-russia-kerch-strait.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes https://www.apnews.com/8a8cd9a266a3440abba77fc6d02f8cec https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/418255-un-ambassador-haley-condemns-russias-seizure-of-ukraine-ships ———————————— Edited by: James Girardier, Julie Goldberg Produced by: Amanda Morones Art Director: Brian Borst Writing/Research: Philip DeFranco, Neena Pesqueda, Cecelia Applegate, Brian Espinoza ———————————— #DeFranco #Kardashians #Russia ————————————
Views: 1075349 Philip DeFranco
What Is Annies Law For Ohio DUI / OVI Cases?
 
04:26
https://www.dominylaw.com/drunk-driving-ovi-dui-defense.html In the first video for the Columbus Bar Association's series 'Understanding Ohio Law', Executive Director Jill Snitcher McQuain interviews attorney Shawn Dominy about Annie's Law in Ohio DUI / OVI cases. For more information on Ohio DUI / OVI issues, see the videos on the Dominy Law Firm YouTube channel, the written information on the Dominy Law Firm website (https://www.dominylaw.com/), the articles on the Dominy Law Firm blog (https://www.columbusoviattorneyblog.com/), and Shawn Dominy’s book ‘I Was Charged With DUI/OVI – Now What?!’ (http://www.ohio-dui-ovi-book.com/). Dominy Law Firm 1900 Polaris Parkway, Suite 450-037 Columbus, OH 43240 614-717-1177 Jill Snitcher McQuain: Hi, I’m Jill Snitcher McQuain, Executive Director at the Columbus Bar Association. I’m here with one of our members, Shawn Dominy, who practices in criminal defense work. He’s here to talk to us a little bit today about the new OVI laws. Shawn, thanks for doing this today. Shawn Dominy: My pleasure. Jill Snitcher McQuain: So, Shawn, what does OVI stand for? Shawn Dominy: OVI stands for operating a vehicle under the influence. Jill Snitcher McQuain: Is that different than DUI? Shawn Dominy: It is slightly different than DUI. Actually, states use different acronyms, and Ohio has used different acronyms in the past. We’ve used DUI. We’ve used OMVI. We currently use OVI, because we dropped the M which was for motor. Jill Snitcher McQuain: Okay. Shawn Dominy: So, it no longer has to be a motor vehicle, just a vehicle. Jill Snitcher McQuain: So, tell us a little bit about what is Annie’s Law? What is the story behind Annie? Who’s Annie? Shawn Dominy: The law was named for Annie Rooney, and in 2013, she was killed by a drunk driver. That drunk driver had multiple prior OVI convictions. Jill Snitcher McQuain: So, what is the new law? How does is toughen the sentences? Shawn Dominy: The new law does a lot of things, but primarily, it does three things. It lengthens the license suspensions for OVI convictions, it classifies more individuals as repeat offenders, and it strongly encourages the use of ignition interlock devices. Jill Snitcher McQuain: What is an ignition interlock device? Shawn Dominy: And ignition interlock device is essentially a breath test for a car. It’s a mechanism which is installed in the ignition and it has a tube. The driver must blow into the tube and must blow alcohol free in order for the car to start. An ignition interlock device may also do a rolling retest, which means the driver must blow into the tube to keep the car running. Jill Snitcher McQuain: What’s to stop someone from just driving someone else’s car that doesn’t have that on there? Shawn Dominy: Good question. So, when a person receives driving privileges with interlock, they’re going to receive a court order. The court order is going to have conditions, and one of the conditions is certainly going to be the defendant may only operate a vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device. If that person violates the order, like as you suggested, driving a car without an interlock, then there will be sanctions, and those sanctions will include a jail sentence, an increased length of the license suspension, and use of a SCRAM device. Jill Snitcher McQuain: What is a SCRAM device? Shawn Dominy: So, SCRAM is another acronym. It means secure remote alcohol monitoring. And what we see in Ohio is the SCRAM is an ankle bracelet with a fuel cell which monitors alcohol at the surface of the skin. And so, if alcohol is detected, then that’s reported to the court. Jill Snitcher McQuain: So, you also mentioned that this law imposes stiffer penalties. Can you tell me a little bit about what that means? Shawn Dominy: Yes. There is a mandatory driver’s license suspension for any OVI conviction. With Annie’s Law, the license suspension length has increased. For example, for a first offense, the minimum suspension used to be six months. Now, the minimum license suspension is 12 months. Jill Snitcher McQuain: And you also mentioned that kind of the impetus behind Annie’s Law is that it tries to get at more of the repeat offenders. How do you think that plays out? Shawn Dominy: That means if a person is convicted of a second offense or more within 10 years, then the minimum mandatory sentences are increased. Jill Snitcher McQuain: Well, thank you, Shawn. I appreciate your time here this morning. As I said, Shawn is one of the members of the Columbus Bar Association, who offers legal assistance to the community. If you are ever looking for a lawyer, call the Columbus Bar Association first. We can help connect you with the right one for you.
First Amendment Court Cases AP Government
 
17:05
Notes on the First Amendment for AP Government at Mundelein High School.
Views: 1112 tjkuhn1
Ensuring Data Protection through European Courts: Recent Cases
 
59:32
Claire Gayrel is a legal officer at the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). / For the premium version, please visit http://www.era.int/?127637&en Benefits of the premium version: - Interactive features - Certificate to earn CPD points - Offline versions (Video, Audio, PDF) - Quiz Topic: The presentation offers a comprehensive overview of the ECtHR and CJEU case law from 2016 until May 2017, tackling controversial topics such as the monitoring of employees and the right to be forgotten.
Views: 175 European Law
Article 134 Mail Crimes Court Martial Lawyer - 1-866-969-9860
 
00:50
http://www.courtmartiallawyers.com Article 134 Mail Crimes Court Martial Lawyer. Military lawyer, Michael Waddington, talks about Article 134 mail crimes and its punishment in a military court martial. Call 1-866-969-9860 to speak with an attorney.
Views: 6365 Michael Waddington
Criminal Cases In Fairfax
 
05:38
For More Law Related Articles Please Visit: http://srislawyer.com/ Criminal Cases In Fairfax #FairfaxCriminalLawyer #CriminalLawyer #CriminalLawyerVA #VACriminalLawyer Criminal Defense Lawyer Virginia Fairfax Attorney In Virginia, a criminal defense lawyer will deal with your arrest, criminal investigation, criminal charges, defending you in court and an appeal. It is best to contact a criminal defense lawyer as soon as you learn of the charges against you. If you are aware that there is an investigation on you then you should contact a criminal defense lawyer as soon as you find out. Most people do not know that they are being charged with a crime until they are arrested of formally charged. If you are charged with a crime, your criminal defense lawyer will defend you and speak on your behalf. In Virginia, a criminal defense lawyer may be hired privately by you or appointed by the court. First, you and your criminal defense lawyer will meet. He or she will ask questions to know the full details of the case. They will thoroughly ask questions to learn possible defenses and the weaknesses of the case. In addition to questioning the defendant, a criminal defense lawyer will investigate further. For example, they may talk to the police about the procedures they used in your case. They may also talk to witnesses who may have any additional information on the case or who are willing to go on the stand to defend you. Your criminal defense lawyer will interview a witness about the testimony he or she can provide to the case. All of this will be done by your criminal defense lawyer in order to build a strong defense for your case. Your criminal defense lawyer has the right to review the prosecution’s case before it is submitted to the jury. Your lawyer might find defects in the prosecution’s case and may want to check that the information they have provided is correct. This can be done by hiring an independent labor expert to examine the case. A criminal defense lawyer in Virginia will also carefully analyze the evidence against you. They will carefully check the facts of the case. He or she may also examine the evidence and see if there are any legal theories that work against your conviction. In Virginia, he or she will personally review your case and will help you in determining the best course of action you should take. For example, it might be in your best interest to plead guilty and take a plea deal which may result in a lesser sentence. However, your criminal defense lawyer might advise you to fight your case in court as evidence against you may be weak. If you need a Virginia Criminal Defense Lawyer to help you with your Criminal Defense case in Virginia, call us at 888-437-7747. After 20 years of practice, Mr. Sris primarily handles complex domestic relations matters and defends individuals charged with cyber-crimes. Occasionally upon a special request, Mr. Sris will handle traffic matters such as reckless driving, DUI or driving on a suspended license. Please Click here to know more about our Lawyers https://srislawyer.com/our-team/ Atchuthan “Sris” Sriskandarajah 4008 Williamsburg Court Fairfax, Virginia 22032 Phone: 703-278-0405 Toll Free: 888-437-7747 If you wish to consult an SRIS Law Group, P.C. domestic violence attorney in Virginia, call us at 888-437-7747. About Me : http://srislawyer.com/mr-sris-former-prosecutor-va-criminal-defense-lawyer/ Website : http://srislawyer.com/ Website : http://attorneyvirginiamaryland.com/ Google Site: https://sites.google.com/site/srislawgroup/home Case Results: https://sites.google.com/site/srislawgroup/ SOME PRACTICE AREAS: #CriminalAttorneyinFairfax #CriminalDefenseAttorneys #CriminalLawyer #CriminalLawyerinFairfax #DWIAttorney #FairfaxCriminalAttorney #FairfaxCriminalDefenseAttorney #FairfaxCriminalDefenseLawyer #FairfaxCriminallawAttorney #FairfaxCriminalLawyer #FairfaxCriminalLawyers #FairfaxDWI #FairfaxLawyer #FairfaxVACriminalLawyer #FairfaxVirginiaCriminalLawyer #FairfaxCriminalLawyerConsultation #Lawyer #VirginiaBeachDWIAttorneys #VirginiaDUILawyer #VirginiaDWILawyer #VirginiaAttorney #VirginiaCriminalDefenseLawyer #CallFairfaxCriminal #Criminal #CriminalAttorneyFairfax #CriminalAttorneyFairfaxva #CriminalCasesinFairfax #CriminalChargesinFairfax #CriminalDefense #CriminalLawAttorney #CriminallawattorneyFairfaxVA #CriminalLawyerFairfax #CriminalLawyerFairfaxCounty #CriminalLawyerFairfaxVA #CriminalLawyerinFairfax #CriminalLawyersFairfax #DefenseLawyersinFairfax #DrugAttorney #DrugCrime #DrugLawyer #DUI #Duiattorneyfairfaxva #DUIAttorneysSpringfieldVA #DUIDefense #DWI #Dwilawyersfairfaxva #Dwilawyersspringfieldva #Fairfaxarlingtoncriminal #Fairfaxcivildefenseattorney #ShopLifting #TrafficCourt #TrafficTicket #Trafficviolation #VACriminalAttorney #VACriminalLawyer DISCLAIMER: This contents includes information about legal issues and
Views: 1 Anthony Noah
SS.7.C.3.12 Landmark Supreme Court Cases
 
11:23
Website - http://civics360.org/modules/r1DNooKrl
Views: 167 civics 360
Supreme Court Recap: How the New Court Handled Federal Court Access
 
31:44
The U.S. Supreme Court charted a confident and decidedly conservative path during the 2017–2018 Term. The Court overruled some long-standing precedent and sometimes turned traditional statutory construction on its head. What did all this mean for plaintiffs’ ability to access federal courts? In our December 2018 episode of the Advocacy Exchange, our monthly conversation with advocates advancing change, we enjoyed our annual conversation with federal court experts Jane Perkins, Legal Director of the National Health Law Program; Gary Smith, Executive Director of Legal Services of Northern California; and Mona Tawatao, Senior Litigator at the Western Center on Law and Poverty. We discussed the general federal-court-access trends from last Supreme Court Term along with specific cases of note. For more, be sure to read Jane, Gary, and Mona’s Clearinghouse article, "The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2017–2018 Term: A Taste of the New Normal." http://povertylaw.org/clearinghouse/articles/PerkinsEtAl
Views: 88 povertylaw